Hey,

Am Montag, den 11.09.2017, 18:00 +0200 schrieb Daniel Gruno:
> Another approach is Commit-Then-Review (CTR), but that should usually
> be confined to specific features like documentation or experimental
> features. in CTR, you commit directly to a main branch, and if
> someone has a problem with it, they will raise an objection.

CTR was the modus of operation for development of netbeans prior to
apache and worked good. There was a limit and that were API changes,
meaning all changes that are visible outside a module. For these API
review was required.

So changes touching API or other global implications could go through
the review-than-commit process, while local changes run through the
commit-than-review (or do nothing) process.

Greetings

Matthias

Reply via email to