Hey, Am Montag, den 11.09.2017, 18:00 +0200 schrieb Daniel Gruno: > Another approach is Commit-Then-Review (CTR), but that should usually > be confined to specific features like documentation or experimental > features. in CTR, you commit directly to a main branch, and if > someone has a problem with it, they will raise an objection.
CTR was the modus of operation for development of netbeans prior to apache and worked good. There was a limit and that were API changes, meaning all changes that are visible outside a module. For these API review was required. So changes touching API or other global implications could go through the review-than-commit process, while local changes run through the commit-than-review (or do nothing) process. Greetings Matthias