Nope. No special knowledge needed, at all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4PBNSRp5g8

Gj



On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Christian Lenz <christian.l...@gmx.net>
wrote:

> I don’t know as much for this Review, so it would be better if there is
> someone else who is doing this, with more advanced experiences.
>
> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
>
> Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 09:11
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Allow code contributions or focus on release only?
>
> Sure your PR will get merged, just not right now since we're focused on
> getting Apache NetBeans released. Do you want to join in with the Module
> Review?
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 09:06, Christian Lenz <christian.l...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
> > So I should not doing any PR (my #3 PR will not be merged, right?) and I
> > should do it on Feature Branches? How is the process for Review and
> > merging? If we have 19275 feature branches, no one knows, when the
> Feature
> > is finish. Maybe we should have a release branch where we should merge
> the
> > stuff from Feature into release or whatever to make it clear: my Feature
> is
> > ready for Review/use etc.
> >
> > Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
> >
> > Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 00:28
> > An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Allow code contributions or focus on release only?
> >
> > Yup -- and corresponds with what we're doing.
> >
> > I love it when a plan comes together.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Wade Chandler <wadechand...@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > That all sounds like a good strategy to me.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Wade
> > >
> > > On Sep 26, 2017 17:44, "Craig Russell" <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have no dog in this particular hunt, but if it were up to me I'd
> > > > prioritize:
> > > >
> > > > getting code into repositories with clean RAT reports
> > > > getting Netbeans to build and run
> > > > creating release(s) for major platforms
> > > > ...
> > > > serious bug reports
> > > > ...
> > > > features (in branches)
> > > >
> > > > Craig
> > > >
> > > > > On Sep 26, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Sven Reimers <sven.reim...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I fully agree with Jan..
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's try to get something released first so we know the process..
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope to have some time to review modules real soon now..
> > > > >
> > > > > -Sven
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 26.09.2017 22:13 schrieb "Jan Lahoda" <lah...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 (I think that if we want to get some rest and fun, we could use
> > > > branches
> > > > >> to experiment with some new features (and I may do so at some
> > point),
> > > > but
> > > > >> we should limit unnecessary changes to master, and use our code
> > > > >> review/discussion bandwidth as much as possible for working on a
> > > > release)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I personally even think we could try to release just the platform
> > > (e.g.
> > > > >> NetBeans Platform 9.0 beta) once the platform modules are
> reviewed.
> > > That
> > > > >> would help us validate whether the approach we are taking makes
> > sense
> > > > (and
> > > > >> what needs to be improved) and would help us learn about the
> release
> > > > >> process (and the platform is a useful thing on its own, so
> releasing
> > > it
> > > > >> wouldn't be just an artificial move).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Jan
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Michael Nascimento <
> > > mist...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Definitely we should focus on getting an Apache NetBeans release.
> > > > >>> Sincerely, at this point, I think we should maybe have a Apache
> > > > NetBeans
> > > > >>> 9.0 Java edition, so we can have something release and then a
> full
> > > > Apache
> > > > >>> NB 9.0. Otherwise, sounds like we'll get no release this year,
> > which
> > > > >> would
> > > > >>> be pretty sad.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > >>> Michael
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&;
> > > > >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> > > > >>> Virus-free.
> > > > >>> www.avg.com
> > > > >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&;
> > > > >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> > > > >>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> > > > >>> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> We need to discuss something, I think -- do we begin accepting
> > pull
> > > > >>>> requests, and thereby encourage pull requests to be created --
> or
> > do
> > > > we
> > > > >>>> focus very narrowly on preparing Apache NetBeans for its first
> > > > >> incubator
> > > > >>>> release?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> If we were to focus narrowly on preparing the Apache release,
> then
> > > > this
> > > > >>> is
> > > > >>>> what we would focus on, nothing else:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/
> > > > >>>> List+of+Modules+to+Review
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> At the same time, of course, people want to add their mark to
> > Apache
> > > > >>>> NetBeans. And that means code or an icon, a menu item, a new UI
> > > thing
> > > > >> to
> > > > >>>> point at and say -- see, I did that! These kinds of enhancements
> > > could
> > > > >> be
> > > > >>>> done at the same time as the above, and would require that some
> > > people
> > > > >>>> split their time between doing the module reviews and reviewing
> > pull
> > > > >>>> requests.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I'm not stating a preference here, just putting the discussion
> out
> > > > >> there,
> > > > >>>> since I've seen conflicting opinions about this and I think it
> > would
> > > > be
> > > > >>>> good to discuss this centrally.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Gj
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Craig L Russell
> > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> > > > c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to