I'm not a member of the Netbeans community, but as an IPMC member I would be -1.
As mentioned on the pages I linked, you're missing quite a few things that are expected of podling votes. - The podling release should be staged on /dist/dev - The podling release must be accompanied by sha, asc, md5 files. We generally don't do automated builds as podling releases. They are typically accompanied by git tags and git commit sha's. You may want to review the content under http://www.apache.org/dev/#releases as well, if you didn't review the vote format I sent you for Juneau. John On 2017-10-08 21:25, Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Ah, I see. Yes. This is a release vote of a single repo. Great. That works > then, excellent. > > So, you'll wait and see how the community responds to the release vote > before voting yourself? > > Gj > > On Monday, October 9, 2017, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Geertjan, > > > > This thread I thought was a release vote. A release isn't graduation. > > Projects often times release single repos. > > > > John > > > > On 2017-10-08 21:15, Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > There are heaps of people from multiple organizations committing to > > Apache > > > NetBeans, i.e., fixing license headers, since several weeks now, so I > > don't > > > see a problem there on that level. Also, lots of discussions and > > > interactions on this mailing list, that's quite clear, isn't it? > > > > > > The only point is that what is going on in this specific thread is that > > > those working on a project in one of the Apache NetBeans repos are trying > > > to graduate that specific repo. If as you say the entire Apache NetBeans > > > community graduates together, then this attempt to graduate one repo > > cannot > > > succeed since the Apache NetBeans community as a whole needs to graduate > > > together. > > > > > > So those working on this repo need to do one of three things: (1) wait > > for > > > the rest of Apache NetBeans to catch up with them, (2) actively > > participate > > > in the rest of Apache NetBeans outside this repo, (3) try to form their > > own > > > separate Apache project independent of Apache NetBeans. > > > > > > My preference would be 2 though I imagine those working on this repo > > would > > > prefer 3. > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 at 03:06, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Graduation is a measure of the community, not any specific repository. > > > > The entire Apache Netbeans community graduates together. > > > > > > > > The key things we look for: > > > > > > > > - Understand the Apache Way > > > > - Understand the release process > > > > > > > > We have a pretty comprehensive graduation guide, > > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html > > > > > > > > The big thing is getting better at community involvement. For > > instance, > > > > its good that someone took the initiative to get a release together. > > Would > > > > be good to see more on list coordination of this. > > > > We'll also want to see that multiple companies are participating from a > > > > functional standpoint. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-08 20:51, Geertjan Wielenga < > > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > So, just to be clear, one repo within Apache NetBeans is permitted to > > > > > graduate separately from the other repos, if the Apache NetBeans > > > > community > > > > > agrees to that? > > > > > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 at 02:48, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Votes are documented here: > > > > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > > > > > > > > > > > It is correct, only IPMC votes are binding. But as an IPMC > > member, I'm > > > > > > unlikely to vote on a RC that hasn't been vetted by the community > > and > > > > > > doesn't have a decent vote for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would recommend reviewing the constraints section, and see if > > there's > > > > > > anything missing from this release. I have a podling you should > > > > compare > > > > > > with, they're just about to graduate so I can guarantee its a good > > > > example > > > > > > of what to do - > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/69862bcfdcc35bd1491b552112c27f > > ef9887a8d38beb7b0e04095e7c@%3Cdev.juneau.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-08 20:31, Geertjan Wielenga < > > > > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I believe the IPMC has binding votes here only. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am also not sure whether this repo can be released separately > > from > > > > > > > incubator-netbeans. Maybe it can, maybe it can't, just saying > > that I > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 at 02:29, Michael Nascimento < > > mist...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > > utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Virus-free. > > > > > > > > www.avg.com > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > > utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Jaroslav Tulach < > > > > > > > > jaroslav.tul...@oracle.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > > I've set a Jenkins job up which can prepare a release bits of > > > > > > HTML/Java > > > > > > > > API > > > > > > > > > and gives instructions how to build the ZIP file and test it: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/ > > > > > > > > > incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > after a bit of configuration struggling the [build > > #16](https:// > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/ > > incubator-netbeans-html4j- > > > > > > > > > release/16/) seems to deliver releasable ZIP file: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/ > > > > > > > > > incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/16/artifact/ > > > > > > > > > incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's md5sum is a45bda33200c208d0d837b0746a7dcce. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done the basic testing on Linux, as well as I tried to > > use > > > > the > > > > > > > > version > > > > > > > > > 1.5 in Bck2Brwsr VM (works fine) and TeaVM which needed a > > [bit of > > > > > > > > patching] > > > > > > > > > (https://github.com/konsoletyper/teavm/pull/304). In any > > case > > > > the > > > > > > > > > HTML/Java > > > > > > > > > API seems releasable from my point of view. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the first attempt to perform Apache release of > > NetBeans > > > > > > HTML/Java > > > > > > > > > API. > > > > > > > > > As such there are almost no new features. Mostly just > > licensing > > > > > > changes, > > > > > > > > > bugfixes and other little tweaks. See Javadoc section about > > post > > > > 1.4 > > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > improvements: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-html4j- > > linux/javadoc/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please take the ZIP file for a spin and vote to approve the > > > > release > > > > > > > > > and to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to publish > > it on > > > > > > > > > our site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote shall close in the usual 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > -jt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: I am keeping my fingers crossed, hoping things go well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
