No problem, I understand all this and the GitHub Travis integration is pretty handy!
What I found odd was that you had to ask INFRA about Travis. But I guess it has something to do with they premium plan Apache is under vs the free plan which has more limits. --emi On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@oracle.com> wrote: > On pondělí 9. října 2017 17:44:12 CEST Emilian Bold wrote: > > Well, I also find it odd how much Apache depends on GitHub. I'm OK with > > Hudson / Jenkins since it's open source and you may (and I have) run it > > yourself. AFAIK Travis is a pure service, no way to run it on my own > server > > and compile it from source code. > > I see. > > Well, in such case we can tell ourselves: GitHub and Travis are just tools > to > do our daily job. The core of Apache is Open: > git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-netbeans-html4j.git > and > builds.apache.org/ > > Nothing will happen if .travis.yml is ignored - at most we get a broken > Jenkins build later. > > -jt > > > > > > > > > --emi > > > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Wade Chandler <wadechand...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > On Oct 9, 2017 05:18, "Emilian Bold" <emilian.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > but I'm > > > not entirely cool with it being a commercial service after all. > > > > > > > > > As opposed to Github or Jenkins (CloudBees)? I don't follow the use of > > > "commercial" here. > > > > > > Wade > > >
