I think the Apache Way is to keep things as close to the Apache project as possible, i.e, creating branches of Apache NetBeans is preferred over forking (even though that’s what we’re doing with the IP clearance), so I think Jan’s suggestion is in line with how it should be.
Gj On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 20:59, John McDonnell <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > No objections, but it would make sense to create a fork on GitHub and > then create a branch on your own fork. > > > John > > > > > > On 20 October 2017 at 19:16, Jan Lahoda <lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a very crude sketch/prototype of support for pattern matching in > > Java (as currently prototyped in OpenJDK Amber, branch patterns): > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/amber/pattern-match.html > > http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/305 > > > > The prototype requires that the runtime JDK is an OpenJDK Amber build > from > > branch patterns. > > > > Any objections against putting that on a branch in the main > > (incubator-netbeans) repo? Branch name could be e.g. > "jdk/amber/patterns". > > > > Thanks, > > Jan > > > > -- > John >
