See the edge release. Although the original issue was something that also
broke IntelliJ, now the edge release moved on and smacked at
org.netbeans.modules.java.source.parsing.PatchModuleFileManager because
some URI was not absolute. I don't know enough of internal NetBeans stuff
to make much sense on this nor understanding what is really wrong with
those URIs.

The project that triggers the error uses Gradle for building for me, did
not tested on anything else, but I'm considering testing that. As such,
NetBeans do no ever shows me the "Compile On Save" option in the project
properties.

Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva

2017-11-11 3:52 GMT-02:00 Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@protonmail.ch>:

> The issue mentions IntelliJ IDEA being also broken so it seems like a
> general Lombok problem, not something NetBeans specific.
>
> Are you using an Ant or a Maven project? Did you disable Compile On Save
> from the project settings (as I assume this might impact Lombok
> postprocessing)?
>
> --emi
>
> >-------- Original Message --------
> >Subject: Lombok (and perhaps other broken annotation processors) makes
> Netbeans nuts.
> >Local Time: November 10, 2017 8:49 PM
> >UTC Time: November 10, 2017 6:49 PM
> >From: victorwssi...@gmail.com
> >To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >
> >I am an user (not a dev) of Lombok, and I'm facing issues with using
> Lombok
> > in Netbeans.
> >
> > Currently, lombok do not works (at least for me) with Netbeans if using
> > Java 9. It does seem to work when I compile it by using Gradle at the
> > command line. See this:
> >
> >https://github.com/rzwitserloot/lombok/issues/1435
> >
> > Also, if lombok, when doing its back-magic annotation processing is able
> to
> > mess up netbeans, so something else would probably also be. Although the
> > lombok guys will eventually fix this issue on their side and even if it
> is
> > unfeasible to handle every case of a broken annotation processor messing
> > with the IDE for whichever reason, Netbeans should at least try to handle
> > this issue graciously.
> >
> > Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva
>

Reply via email to