On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 at 16:41 Antonio <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: > Then could restrict wiki editing to the team, using the editor for > ourselves, and allow the world to submit PRs against 'X'. >
If we're doing that and not allowing wider permissions, I don't see that we gain much by adding cloning between. Surely we can just run a standard repo and forget the GH wiki specifically - we can still edit online. The only thing we really lose is the toolbar, but that was more with wider access in mind - if we're doing PRs then doesn't seem much point. If we find we want a better UI later, there are options (like Netlify CMS, but also others). Mind you, not sure if any support asciidoc over markdown - was there a particular reason you went with that? Best wishes, Neil -- Neil C Smith Artist & Technologist www.neilcsmith.net Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
