Yes. gene...@incubator.netbeans.org.

Simply, the PPMC vote on the dev mailing list has succeeded. Now the IPMC
vote is taking place, on the general mailing list. IPMC members, e.g., our
mentors, have a binding vote there, Ate and Bertrand have already voted +1.
Anyone else can vote too there, though non-binding unless you’re an IPMC
member. We need three binding +1 votes and anything else is icing on the
cake, the more icing the better.

And all this stuff in this thread about build systems should be ignored. If
someone wants to discuss something unrelated to voting, please stop
hijacking this thread and start a new one.

Thanks,

Gj


On Saturday, May 26, 2018, Glenn Holmer <ce...@kolabnow.com> wrote:

> On 05/26/2018 04:19 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> > We have insufficient votes on the Apache NetBeans (incubating) RC1
> release.
> >
> > So, I encourage everyone to join the gene...@incubator.netbeans.org
> mailing list and add their non-binding vote to our thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/13af566fb266308d0a91c3e860d22f
> b1766464df9fe94126d74084fb@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>
> First of all, it's "gene...@incubator.apache.org", yes?
>
> I'm confused by what's going on here. Have the mentors voted against the
> release, or have not enough mentors voted in favor? Is there consensus
> among them on what is keeping us from getting a positive result?
>
> And why is there so much shilly-shallying about over build systems here
> when we have bigger fish to fry? How can the average non-committer help
> to get a release out the door?
>
> --
> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to