On 28/09/18 22:00, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, 20:07 Antonio, <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote:
2- http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/index.html
Requires the DNS stuff being in Apache, setting up a repo and a
gitpubsub, will lose previous (5.0-8.2) javadocs.
No it won't. The idea is to redirect 404s back to Oracle, same as already
discussed with infra about the main website.
Ah, I see, so we need Oracle to set up a "legacy.bits.netbeans.org"
website with the current content, right? So that all 404s that reach
bits.netbeans.org end up in legacy.bits.netbeans.org. Wasn't that the plan?
I recall talking something about a proxy to make the whole thing
transparent to the users, but I don't know the details. Maybe you want
to lead this after wednesday?
And possibly not /dev to start with, just /9.0 and /10.0?
I suggested earlier not hosting the Javadocs under netbeans.apache.org at
least for now. We could rethink that later, but I think keeping it away
from JBake would be a very good idea!
There's a misunderstanding here, I think.
Hosting the javadocs at netbeans.apache.org does not require JBake at
all. It's just copying the generated javadocs in a directory inside the
"content" directory in the "asf-site" branch:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-website/tree/asf-site/content
Adding stuff to a directory there and pushing to the "asf-site" branch
should be good enough. I can set up a Jenkins job for this quickly if
you want to see a demo.
Anyway, shall we run a voting on the approach, including the javadocs.io
idea from John?
Thanks,
Antonio
But, yes, is there consensus / disagreement to that approach?
Best wishes,
Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
