Why Schliemann over ANTLR? I am just curious as ANTLR appears to have a lot of traction.
-Ryan > On Dec 3, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Sven Reimers <sven.reim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > If we gather enough interest and support in/from the community - I would > suggest looking into the Schliemann approach and figure out if we can build > a new, better version... > > Any volunteers interested in investigating? > > -Sven > > Am Mo., 3. Dez. 2018, 20:41 hat Enrico Scantamburlo <scanti.ru...@gmail.com> > geschrieben: > >> The module is deprecated. We are still using it because we developed much >> stuff on the top of it, but it is very buggy and unsupported as far as I >> know. Too bad because we had high expectations from it. >> >> Il giorno lun 3 dic 2018, 19:57 Mario Schroeder <ma.schroe...@gmail.com> >> ha >> scritto: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> after implementing language support the hard way with ANTLR and self >>> written LanguageHierachy, I accidently came accross the Generic Language >>> Framework, aka Projekt Schliemann. >>> >>> I know it is quite old. So therefore my question: Is it still a solution >> to >>> create support for a new language? Or shall I keep a distance from that >>> module? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mario >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
