Let's start with a definition of the requirements.

Gj


On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:35 PM Oleg Minukhin <mino...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Geertjan,
>
> I am interesting to help with some Groovy / Grails integration, at least
> to the degree it was before. How would I start?
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018, 11:00 AM Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> That makes sense. It was probably right to disable the old Grails support
>> that we had.
>>
>> If someone can provide a 'hello world' Grails/Micronaut sample, we can
>> integrate that and, if needed, build support around it. Maybe we can reuse
>> some of the old Grails support, but probably not.
>>
>> Gj
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 5:54 PM Rik Scarborough <rik...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The Grails team has made a statement that they intend on moving Grails
>>> into
>>> the Micronaut structure.
>>>
>>> ~Rik
>>> Believe in good
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018, 10:51 AM Geertjan Wielenga
>>> <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all, especially Jasen and Oleg, who recently commented on Grails
>>> support
>>> > in Apache NetBeans,
>>> >
>>> > Now that we have released Apache NetBeans 10, and are looking to Apache
>>> > NetBeans 11, which will included the enterprise cluster, i.e.,
>>> including
>>> > support for application servers, which is relevant for Grails
>>> deployment,
>>> > maybe we could look at reintegrating Grails features into Apache
>>> NetBeans
>>> > 11?
>>> >
>>> > Here's the related PR where we disabled Grails support (because of
>>> lack of
>>> > enterprise cluster integration and because the version of Grails
>>> supported
>>> > was outdated):
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/904/commits/1a5259cfcba106430d95f039480578ff9ba41e34
>>> >
>>> > Or should we not focus on Grails at all, or Micronaut instead? Would be
>>> > good to define what we'd like to achieve with Grails together and come
>>> up
>>> > with a plan.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Gj
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to