What's the thoughts on creating a proper 0.3.0 tag, as would be traditional for a final release? It is arguably a little confusing to only have the RC tags, when looking for the final release. I found this head scratching for 0.2.0 as well.
Adam On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Esteban Aliverti < esteban.alive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks! > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > Esteban Aliverti > - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Esteban > > > > The tag you mention is the correct tag for the 0.3.0 source. > > > > Thanks > > Joe > > On Sep 21, 2015 4:43 AM, "Esteban Aliverti" <esteban.alive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > I want to give v. 0.3.0 a try and I would like to know where the source > > > code for that version is. > > > Right now, master has 0.3.1-SNAPSHOT version. I noticed there is a > > > nifi-0.3.0-RC1 > > > < > > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=2ec735e35025fed3c63d51128ec0609ffe1fa7e3 > > > > > > > tag > > > that has 0.3.0 version in its poms. Should I use 0.3.0-RC1 then? Is > this > > > branch already frozen? It will be any other branch for 0.3.0 final? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > > > > > Esteban Aliverti > > > - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com > > > > > >
