Given the testing to NIFI-1192 and review of NIFI-631 done already both are lower risk I think.
NIFI-1107 seems very useful and helpful but we do need to be careful given that we know this one is already in use and this is a substantive change. If there are folks that can dig into review/testing of NIFI-1107 that would be great. Waiting for word on NIFI-655 readiness then I think we should go cold and just focus on testing an RC. Thanks Joe On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed. I know there has already been a good deal of discussion about > design on all these. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> No qualms here. If they look good to go while the work and testing >> surrounding NIFI-655 wraps up, they might as well be included. Would not >> want to delay the release should any of these become protracted in terms of >> iterations. >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > All, >> > I was reviewing github PRs and wondering whether anyone objected to >> > slipping a couple that look like they're very close into 0.4.0. >> > >> > NIFI-1192 (#131) >> > NIFI-631 (#113) >> > NIFI-1107 (#192) >> > >> > I should have some review cycles tonight. Lots of comments on them all, >> and >> > have good "momentum". >> > >> > Tony >> > >>
