Pierre, In my view the best and first test of interest is your own. If you see that you could use it then there is a good shot others will as well. I think interaction with SNMP makes sense and look forward to checking it out if you do find time to contribute that.
Thanks Joe On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Pierre Villard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Would that be of any interest to have processors for SNMP exchanges using > snmp4j? > > I was thinking about something like: > > GetSNMP >> possibility to do a SNMP get or a SNMP walk, the flow file would not have > any content, just attributes with key = requested oid and value = requested > value. > > SetSNMP >> do a SNMP set according to flow file / processor properties. There are > multiple options there, don't know what sounds best. > > If you think it could be useful, I will have a look developing that. > > Pierre
