Confirmed that is the expected commit.  I'll check each commit id
against all JIRAs for 0.5.1 now too.

Thanks Tony!

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Starting rc1 build off of 280714942097b0703a1f8f92913d95159cd89bfa
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Patch has been incorporated into master and support/nifi-0.5.x. Thanks.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Would like to get james wing patch incorporated.  Will ping asap.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Joe
>> > On Feb 22, 2016 7:22 PM, "Tony Kurc" <trk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > All, I've started building nifi-0.5.1-RC1 from commit
>> > > f56e1551ebc20495d9bf7cf70814c0e4afba768a. Halt me ASAP if you believe
>> > this
>> > > is erroneous
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Yes.
>> > > > On Feb 22, 2016 5:31 PM, "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Tony,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I believe 0.5.1 is ready to roll with the exception of NIFI-1542 and
>> > > >> NIFI-1545 needing to be merged in.  They appear ready to roll.  Can
>> > > >> you do that as part of kicking off the RC?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks
>> > > >> Joe
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Oleg Zhurakousky
>> > > >> <ozhurakou...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> > > >> > 1536 will be in shortly
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> On Feb 21, 2016, at 14:17, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Tony,
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Just chatted with Oleg.  Sounds like he has a potential solution
>> > for
>> > > >> >> NIFI-1536.  I did some testing for NIFI-1527 that I've reopened
>> so
>> > we
>> > > >> >> can validate what was observed.  NIFI-1542 is open.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> NIFI-1536 and NIFI-1542 could be moved off of 0.5.1 but NIFI-1527
>> > > >> should not be.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> So looks like we're not quite ready yet.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Thanks
>> > > >> >> Joe
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> sunday works for me.
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>>>
>> > > >> >>>> Ok so looks like the major players for the 0.5.1 release are
>> in.
>> > > >> >>>> Today during some testing it was discovered that there can be
>> > > issues
>> > > >> >>>> with multiple HDFS processors with differing configurations and
>> > > >> >>>> yesterday on StackOverflow it was reported that there are some
>> > > issues
>> > > >> >>>> talking to Kafka but there is a viable workaround for now.  I
>> > > >> >>>> personally feel like what we have for an 0.5.1 is good right
>> now
>> > > >> >>>> without those two JIRAs and that we could do an 0.5.2 if those
>> > get
>> > > >> >>>> sorted soon or they can go in 0.6.0 which if we stick to the
>> > > >> >>>> previously discussed idea would be mid-March.
>> > > >> >>>>
>> > > >> >>>> What do ya'll think?
>> > > >> >>>>
>> > > >> >>>> If we did a kick-off of RC say late Sunday (assuming RM is on
>> > board
>> > > >> >>>> too of course) we'd be looking at a midweek release for 0.5.1
>> > > >> >>>>
>> > > >> >>>> Thanks
>> > > >> >>>> Joe
>> > > >> >>>>
>> > > >> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>>>> +1
>> > > >> >>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Tony Kurc <
>> trk...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>>>>> All,
>> > > >> >>>>>> Just so we're clear, my expectations is that the fixes we
>> need
>> > > >> above
>> > > >> >>>> will
>> > > >> >>>>>> go into master (0.6.0-SNAPSHOT). I (or the contributor) will
>> > > >> attempt to
>> > > >> >>>>>> also apply those fixes to a branch I made off of nifi-0.5.0,
>> > > called
>> > > >> >>>>>> "support/nifi-0.5.x", and when done we can test and when
>> > > satisfied,
>> > > >> >>>> start
>> > > >> >>>>>> the 0.5.1 release process.
>> > > >> >>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Tony Kurc <
>> trk...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>> I lieu of a decision on a git branching strategy, does
>> anyone
>> > > >> object
>> > > >> >>>> to me
>> > > >> >>>>>>> naming a branch "support/0.5.x" so I can start pulling
>> > together
>> > > >> 0.5.1?
>> > > >> >>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Joe Witt <
>> > joe.w...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Team,
>> > > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> First, congrats on getting 0.5.0 out the door.  Very nice
>> > > >> release with
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> excellent new features, enhancements, and bug fixes with
>> > > >> involvement
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> of many new contributors.
>> > > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> The effort toward 0.6.0 is well underway and if we are
>> > shooting
>> > > >> for
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> our original target would still arrive around mid
>> march-ish.
>> > > >> Seems
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> reasonable given progress so far.
>> > > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> That said, I'd like to propose we go ahead and put out an
>> > 0.5.1
>> > > >> as
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> soon as the patches are addressed.  The finding that Lars
>> > > helped
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> expose and that Mark Payne is now working  [1] in my view
>> > > >> warrants a
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> release by itself as it is data loss related.  Also, we can
>> > > >> address
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> the work Matt Gilman is doing to ensure properly authorized
>> > > >> users can
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> access resources they're being blocked by [2] and the
>> > > >> license/notice
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> findings Sean discovered during the last release [3].
>> There
>> > > are
>> > > >> a
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> couple odd/ends in the list as well [4].  Purely a bug fix
>> > > >> release as
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> spec'd out in release notes [5].
>> > > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> I checked with Tony and he is happy to continue performing
>> RM
>> > > >> tasks on
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> the 0.5.x line.
>> > > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1527
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1497
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1520
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> [4] https://s.apache.org/nifi-0.5.1-candidate
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> [5]
>> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes
>> > > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Joe
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to