Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/237#discussion_r56216003
  
    --- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-cassandra-bundle/nifi-cassandra-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/cassandra/AbstractCassandraProcessor.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,463 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.nifi.processors.cassandra;
    +
    +import com.datastax.driver.core.Cluster;
    +import com.datastax.driver.core.ConsistencyLevel;
    +import com.datastax.driver.core.DataType;
    +import com.datastax.driver.core.Metadata;
    +import com.datastax.driver.core.Row;
    +import com.datastax.driver.core.SSLOptions;
    +import com.datastax.driver.core.Session;
    +import org.apache.avro.Schema;
    +import org.apache.avro.SchemaBuilder;
    +import org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils;
    +import org.apache.nifi.authorization.exception.ProviderCreationException;
    +import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyDescriptor;
    +import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyValue;
    +import org.apache.nifi.components.ValidationContext;
    +import org.apache.nifi.components.ValidationResult;
    +import org.apache.nifi.components.Validator;
    +import org.apache.nifi.logging.ProcessorLog;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.AbstractProcessor;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.ProcessContext;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.Relationship;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.util.StandardValidators;
    +import org.apache.nifi.security.util.SslContextFactory;
    +import org.apache.nifi.ssl.SSLContextService;
    +
    +import javax.net.ssl.SSLContext;
    +import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
    +import java.util.ArrayList;
    +import java.util.Arrays;
    +import java.util.Collection;
    +import java.util.HashSet;
    +import java.util.List;
    +import java.util.Map;
    +import java.util.Set;
    +import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
    +
    +/**
    + * AbstractCassandraProcessor is a base class for Cassandra processors and 
contains logic and variables common to most
    + * processors integrating with Apache Cassandra.
    + */
    +public abstract class AbstractCassandraProcessor extends AbstractProcessor 
{
    +
    +    public static final int DEFAULT_CASSANDRA_PORT = 9042;
    +
    +    private static final Validator HOSTNAME_PORT_VALIDATOR = new 
Validator() {
    +        @Override
    +        public ValidationResult validate(final String subject, final 
String input, final ValidationContext context) {
    +            final List<String> esList = Arrays.asList(input.split(","));
    +            for (String hostnamePort : esList) {
    +                String[] addresses = hostnamePort.split(":");
    +                // Protect against invalid input like 
http://127.0.0.1:9042 (URL scheme should not be there)
    +                if (addresses.length != 2) {
    +                    return new 
ValidationResult.Builder().subject(subject).input(input).explanation(
    +                            "Each entry must be in hostname:port form (no 
scheme such as http://, and port must be specified)")
    --- End diff --
    
    Sorry I meant to reply before. This is a list of hostname:port entries, I 
think it would be more confusing to have one property for a hostname list 
followed by an associated list of ports. That's why I added a single validator 
which now also validates the port, and that validator is applied to each entry 
in the list


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to