Updated the downloads page and pushed out changes with the language you provided above.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Will take care of it. > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We should also update the downloads page to ensure folks are aware of >> this issue. >> >> I recommend phrasing such as: >> "Before downloading this version please see the release notes [link]. >> There is a regression with PutKafka that can cause data loss when >> sending to Kafka. We will have an 0.6.1 release very soon to address >> that finding." >> >> I can't do it myself right now but if someone else can that would be >> really helpful. >> >> Thanks >> Joe >> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Oleg Zhurakousky >> <ozhurakou...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> > +1 >> >> On Mar 31, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I have updated the release notes to reflect that we will produce an >> >> 0.6.1 to correct the PutKafka problem >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes >> >> >> >> I will start the RM work on this assuming lazy consensus though >> >> clearly there is a good sign of consensus already >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> +1 - definitely agree that it warrants a patch release. >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Mar 31, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Team, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I propose that we do an Apache NiFi 0.6.1 release. There are a few >> >>>>> important findings we've made and put JIRAs/PRs in for over the past >> >>>>> couple of days. The most concerning is that I believe we have a >> >>>>> potential data loss issue introduced in PutKafka. The general logic >> >>>>> of that processor is far better now but the handling of stream >> >>>>> demarcation is broken. That is now fixed from NIFI-1701. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I am happy to RM this if folks are in agreement. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks >> >>>>> Joe >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> > >> > >
