Everyone, It looks as though the issues mentioned yesterday have been solved for 0.3.0. I apologize for being the long pole in addressing these issues in a release that has seen some great work by a great group of contributors.
A new ticket was created in response to an issue that helped expose MINIFICPP-293 [0]. A fix for that ticket, MINIFICPP-308 [2], has been submitted and is ready for review. I will try and go through the PR later this evening or early tomorrow morning before a flight and merge it. That will close out the release, unless anyone objects. I'm unavailable the next few days ( and will be in an isolated area without internet) so the plan is to to tag and release Monday afternoon or Tuesday morning, unless the release is needed sooner. Thanks, Marc [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-293 [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-309 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-308 On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Marc <phroc...@apache.org> wrote: > Everyone, > I've been getting through some apache LDAP issues, hence the delay; > however, we do have three remaining issues -- > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MINIFICPP/versions/12341640. > > One is still under development. We can move it, but that would mean we > can't compile in CENTOS 6. At this time my goal is to resolve the > blockers/criticals since they would alienate whole groups of users. I've > moved everything else from 0.3.0. > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Marc <phroc...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Aldrin, >> +1 to the idea of making a release. >> >> Happy to try my hand at RM duties. >> >> Can't promise I'll do well at it, but I can promise that when I screw >> up, we'll all have a good laugh. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> We've had a fair amount of work and enhancements to the framework and >>> extensions and seemed like a logical place to offer up a new release. >>> Both >>> Execute Script and HTTP Site to Site seem to be nearing their merge into >>> master. With a quick look through other open JIRAs it appears as some of >>> the newer tickets starting progress might be extended efforts. >>> >>> Let me know if anyone has any thoughts or comments. Otherwise, we can >>> try >>> to generate an RC and vote in the next week. I am happy to act as RM if >>> no >>> one else is interested in doing so (likely have some docs I need to >>> update >>> to capture the process a bit better). >>> >>> >>> --Aldrin >>> >> >> >
