I did not look for all bugs patched since 1.7.0 was released; I was just replying to people who had commented on this thread explicitly asking for certain things. I do not intend to pull in any commits other than what was explicitly requested.
Andy LoPresto alopre...@apache.org alopresto.apa...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 > On Jul 9, 2018, at 6:38 PM, Matt Burgess <mattyb...@apache.org> wrote: > > This Jira search [1] for Bugs resolved in 1.8.0 has 10 items, there > are some I don't see in this list (NIFI-5278 [2] and NIFI-5349 [3]), > should these all be included or on a case-by-case basis? > > Thanks, > Matt > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5394?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20and%20Type%20%3D%20Bug%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5278 > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5349 > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:11 PM Andy LoPresto <alopre...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> To clarify for everyone posting on this thread, 0.0.x releases are bug fix >> releases only, and cannot introduce new features. We will release a 1.7.1 >> version with the fix for NIFI-5370 (wildcard certificate issue in secure >> cluster) but this release will not contain any new feature work. Currently, >> I have slated for it: >> >> * NIFI-5370 wildcard cert fix <- not yet merged; needs +1 >> * NIFI-5377 stack overflow with circular reference <- not yet merged; needs >> +1 >> * NIFI-5316 bug in FetchParquet >> * NIFI-5361 processors with active threads do not run on restart >> * NIFI-5362 suppress error message on successful processor termination >> >> Not addressed: >> >> * NIFI-5331 poisoned journal requires restart <- no work done on this that I >> see >> * NIFI-5368 transitive controller services not validated by mock runner <- >> no work done on this that I see >> * Docker improvements >> * NIFI-5334 GetMongo passing NiFi flowfile attributes >> >> >> Andy LoPresto >> alopre...@apache.org >> alopresto.apa...@gmail.com >> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 >> >> On Jul 9, 2018, at 12:21 PM, Ryan Hendrickson >> <ryan.andrew.hendrick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ahh gotcha, and good point on grabbing the master. I may do that... >> >> Thanks, >> Ryan >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:18 PM Andy LoPresto <alopre...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Ryan, >> >> That sounds like a separate discussion the community should weigh in on. >> Right now, the release management process is fairly extensive and takes a >> few days of manual work to perform. In addition, releases need to be voted >> on by the community in order to be released, so this is an effort for >> community members as well. >> >> I’m not opposed to improving our RM process to make this work easier, but >> it’s not as simple as just cutting a release more frequently at this point >> in time. If you so desire, you can always checkout the current master or >> specific feature branches. It’s possible we could do something like a >> nightly tag, but officially releasing that through the Apache process is >> probably not doable in the near-term. >> >> The semantic versioning is also an issue, because 1.6.x releases are >> supposed to be bug fixes only, not feature releases [1]. >> >> For the public API the Apache NiFi project aims to follow versioning >> principles as described at Semantic Versioning 2.0.0 <http://semver.org/> >> >> Consider the following scenarios in the context of the most recent >> 'example' release being 0.0.1 and with the understanding that these are >> about the public API as defined above. >> >> - For releases which are comprised solely of bug fixes or non-feature >> introducing or enhancing changes that requires only a 'patch' version bump >> (the Z part in X.Y.Z). So the next release then is 0.0.2. >> - For releases which include backward compatible changes to introduce >> feature enhancements or new features that requires a 'minor' version change >> and the 'patch' version resets to '0' (the Y part in X.Y.0). So the next >> release then is 0.1.0. A 'minor' version change is also required for any >> change that could result in an existing flow becoming invalid, such as the >> addition of a required property with no default or the addition of a >> relationship, or the removal of a property or relationship. Note: it is >> *NOT* acceptable in a 'minor' version to change anything that can >> result in an existing flow behaving differently (other than a component >> becoming invalid). Doing so would fundamentally alter the way in which >> organizations process data without them realizing it. >> - For releases which include non-backward compatible changes or >> changes deemed so substantive by the community that it is considered a >> 'major' version change and the minor and patch versions reset to '0' (the X >> part in X.0.0). So the next release then is 1.0.0. >> >> After a release occurs the 'patch' version will be automatically adjusted >> by maven without the release manager doing anything special. So rarely >> will this value need to be manually set. In the event of a 'major' or >> 'minor' bump though the entire relevant source tree will need to be >> adjusted. >> >> >> >> [1] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Version+Scheme+and+API+Compatibility >> >> Andy LoPresto >> alopre...@apache.org >> *alopresto.apa...@gmail.com <alopresto.apa...@gmail.com>* >> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 >> >> On Jul 9, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Ryan Hendrickson < >> ryan.andrew.hendrick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> As a user of NiFi, and someone converting things to use more standard >> processors, vs writing custom ones, I'd prefer smaller releases, or >> possible a release that only updates Processors with the bug fixes and >> improvements that went into them vs having to diff the configuration files >> each upgrade. The bigger releases, like 1.6.0 (163 updates), and 1.7.0 >> (191 updates) are great, but the waiting game for fixes to go into a >> release seems long. I'd love a weekly release, or even just know that once >> a month there will be a 1.6.x release coming out with updates to >> processors. >> >> That said, I can't wait for this fix, slated for 1.8.0: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5334 (GetMongo should pass >> along NiFi FlowFile Attributes), love to see it in a 1.7.1. >> >> Ryan >> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:55 AM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Aldrin and I got some Docker improvements in lately that might be good to >> throw in as well. They can definitely wait until 1.8 if everyone wants to >> KISS this release, but they could also add some real value for the docker >> users too. >> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 1:31 AM V, Prashanth (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) < >> prashant...@nokia.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks Andy.. +1 for 1.7.1 release. >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Prashanth >> >> From: Andy LoPresto [mailto:alopre...@apache.org <alopre...@apache.org>] >> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2018 1:34 AM >> To: dev@nifi.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [discuss] should we do a nifi 1.7.1 release? >> >> I’m working on the wildcard cert issue and would be able to put that >> >> along >> >> with some other minor fixes into a 1.7.1 release. >> >> Andy LoPresto >> alopre...@apache.org<mailto:alopre...@apache.org <alopre...@apache.org>> >> alopresto.apa...@gmail.com<mailto:alopresto.apa...@gmail.com >> <alopresto.apa...@gmail.com>> >> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 >> >> On Jul 5, 2018, at 11:01 AM, Robert R. Bruno <rbru...@gmail.com<mailto: >> rbru...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> +1 as well. Any chance of this one as well? >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5316 >> >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 11:33 Mark Bean <mark.o.b...@gmail.com<mailto: >> mark.o.b...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> +1 for a 1.7.1 release if it contains a fix for NIFI-5368 [1]. This bug >> >> is >> >> breaking multiple unit tests on custom processors. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5368 >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:23 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com<mailto: >> joe.w...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> team, >> >> Wanted to kick off a thread to suggest we do a nifi 1.7.1 release. It >> sounds like we might have an issue handling wildcard certs in 1.7.0 >> [1] and it was reported again in an email today i think. Also, if >> this one is deemed legit it seems worth sorting out [2]. I'd imagine >> there are a few other bug fixes as well we can pull in. >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5370 >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5377 >> >> Thanks >> Joe >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
