The vote to create the NiFi Standard Libraries sub-project passes with:

    14 +1 (binding) votes
    0 +1 (non-binding) votes
    0 0 votes
    0 -1 votes

Thanks to all who helped make this release possible.

Here is the PMC vote thread:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nifi-dev/201909.mbox/%3CCALo_M189HjwCvL_Sz3jcDcBoidS7%3DBictz7t4AfCPF_ixkGjeg%40mail.gmail.com%3E



On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:47 AM Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:44 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:48 PM Brandon DeVries <brandon.devr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1, binding
> > >
> > > Brandon
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 1:35 PM
> > > To: dev@nifi.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [VOTE] Create NiFi Standard Libraries sub-project
> > >
> > > I'm a +1 as well.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Sep 4, 2019, at 6:02 AM, Pierre Villard <pierre.villard...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > As a minor comment - but definitely not the place to discuss it - I
> > > wonder
> > > > if having a dedicated JIRA for that is really required. We could have 
> > > > the
> > > > same approach as we do with nifi-fds (use the NIFI JIRA with the right
> > > use
> > > > of tags, components, versions).
> > > >
> > > > Le mer. 4 sept. 2019 à 08:22, Jeff <jtsw...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > >> +1 Create NiFi Standard Libraries (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:19 AM Peter Wicks (pwicks) <pwi...@micron.com
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1, binding
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> From: Kevin Doran <kdo...@apache.org>
> > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 7:12 PM
> > > >>> To: dev@nifi.apache.org; dev@nifi.apache.org
> > > >>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [VOTE] Create NiFi Standard Libraries sub-project
> > > >>>
> > > >>> +1, binding
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ________________________________
> > > >>> From: Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 8:33 PM
> > > >>> To: dev@nifi.apache.org
> > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create NiFi Standard Libraries sub-project
> > > >>>
> > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:29 AM Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1, binding
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 19:46 Yolanda Davis <yolanda.m.da...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> +1 Create NiFi Standard Libraries (binding)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:03 PM Koji Kawamura
> > > >>>>> <ijokaruma...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 Create NiFi Standard Libraries (binding)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 7:25 AM Mike Thomsen
> > > >>>>>> <mikerthom...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> +1 binding
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:33 PM Andy LoPresto
> > > >>>>>>> <alopre...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> +1, create NiFi Standard Libraries (binding)
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Andy LoPresto
> > > >>>>>>>> alopre...@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>> alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D
> > > >>>>>>>> EF69
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 3, 2019, at 2:16 PM, Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> All,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> In a previous thread there was a plan discussed to
> > > >>>>>>>>> restructure
> > > >>>> some
> > > >>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>> the repositories in order to address several different
> > > >>>>>>>>> issues,
> > > >>>> such
> > > >>>>>> as
> > > >>>>>>>>> build time, reusability of code, and eventually separating
> > > >>>>>>>>> how
> > > >>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>> framework and extensions are released [1][2].
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> The overall plan requires many steps to get there, so I'd
> > > >>>>>>>>> like to propose starting with a small actionable step - the
> > > >>>>>>>>> creation of a
> > > >>>>> new
> > > >>>>>>>>> sub-project called NiFi Standard Libraries (formerly
> > > >>>>>>>>> referred to
> > > >>>> as
> > > >>>>>>>>> nifi-commons).
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Project Name: Apache NiFi Standard Libraries Git Repository:
> > > >>>>>>>>> nifi-standard-libraries
> > > >>>>>>>>> JIRA: NIFILIBS
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Description:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> A collection of standard implementations used across the
> > > >>>>>>>>> NiFi
> > > >>>>>> ecosystem.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Candidate Libraries:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> In general, each library may consist of multiple Maven
> > > >>>>>>>>> modules,
> > > >>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>> should be independent from the rest of the ecosystem, and
> > > >>>>>>>>> from
> > > >>>>> other
> > > >>>>>>>>> libraries within NiFi Standard Libraries.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> In addition, each library may make it's own decision about
> > > >>>> whether
> > > >>>>> it
> > > >>>>>>>>> is considered a public facing extension point/API, or an
> > > >>>>>>>>> internal library that may be changed at any time. This
> > > >>>>>>>>> should be
> > > >>>> documented
> > > >>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>> a README at the root of each library, such as
> > > >>>>>>>>> nifi-standard-libraries/nifi-xyz/README.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> An initial library that has been discussed was referred to
> > > >>>>>>>>> as 'nifi-security' and would centralize much of the security
> > > >>>>>>>>> related
> > > >>>>>> code
> > > >>>>>>>>> shared by NiFi and NiFi Registry, such as shared security
> > > >>>>>>>>> APIs,
> > > >>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>> implementations for various providers, such as
> > > >>> LDAP/Kerberos/etc.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> A second candidate library would be an optimistic-locking
> > > >>>>>>>>> library based on NiFi's revision concept. Currently this has
> > > >>>>>>>>> been created inside nifi-registry for now [3], but could be
> > > >>>>>>>>> moved as soon as nifi-standard-libraries exists.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> (This list does not have to be final in order to decide if
> > > >>>>>>>>> we are creating NiFi Standard Libraries or not)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Integration & Usage:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Once NiFi Standard Libraries is created, the community can
> > > >>>>>>>>> start creating and/or moving code there and perform releases
> > > >>>>>>>>> as
> > > >>>>> necessary.
> > > >>>>>> A
> > > >>>>>>>>> release will consist of the standard Apache source release,
> > > >>>>>>>>> plus artifacts released to Maven central. The community can
> > > >>>>>>>>> then
> > > >>>> decide
> > > >>>>>>>>> when it is appropriate to integrate these released libraries
> > > >>>>>>>>> into
> > > >>>>> one
> > > >>>>>>>>> of our downstream projects.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> For example, if we create a nifi-security library in
> > > >>>>>>>>> nifi-standard-libraries, we can release that whenever we
> > > >>>>>>>>> decide,
> > > >>>>> but
> > > >>>>>>>>> we may not integrate it into NiFi or NiFi Registry until it
> > > >>>>>>>>> makes sense for a given release of those projects.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for 48 hours, please vote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Create NiFi Standard Libraries [ ] +0 no opinion [ ]
> > > >>>>>>>>> -1 Do not create NiFi Standard Libraries because...
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapach
> > > >>>> e-nifi.1125220.n5.nabble.com
> > > %2Fdiscuss-Splitting-NiFi-framework-and-ex
> > > >>>> tension-repos-and-releases-td27499.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpwicks%40mi
> > > >>>> cron.com
> > > %7Cc81e3e4badd04535ffc508d730d4e61d%7Cf38a5ecd28134862b11bac1d
> > > >>>> 563c806f%7C0%7C0%7C637031563258015148&amp;sdata=m7YbxAEybvM0JzYmvB1KKu
> > > >>>> 461I4w38jQtkeZ1Wfdt7o%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >>>>>>>>> [2]
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwik
> > > >>>> i.apache.org
> > > %2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FNIFIREG%2FNiFi%2BProject%2Band%2
> > > >>>> BRepository%2BRestructuring&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpwicks%40micron.com
> > > %7Cc
> > > >>>> 81e3e4badd04535ffc508d730d4e61d%7Cf38a5ecd28134862b11bac1d563c806f%7C0
> > > >>>> %7C0%7C637031563258015148&amp;sdata=XSSCVo0AJoh46tpddUMScEjxDy1RRX2c%2
> > > >>>> FBRAD%2FtDeQQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >>>>>>>>> [3]
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
> > > >>>> ub.com
> > > %2Fapache%2Fnifi-registry%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2Fnifi-registry-core%2
> > > >>>> Fnifi-registry-revision&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpwicks%40micron.com
> > > %7Cc81e3
> > > >>>> e4badd04535ffc508d730d4e61d%7Cf38a5ecd28134862b11bac1d563c806f%7C0%7C0
> > > >>>> %7C637031563258015148&amp;sdata=p%2FTCdfpvXdN0TysMHkIKeP3cnNs8bEERHro3
> > > >>>> NVfnfi4%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> yolanda.m.da...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>> @YolandaMDavis
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >

Reply via email to