Yes, that makes sense. I agree that we should stay on 0.x until we
feel comfortable committing to a stable API.
I agree that it's time for a release. It would be nice if we could
make a release every ~3 months. I'm not aware of any issue that should
block the release.
Thanks.

On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 13:10, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:06 AM Arpad Boda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for bringing this up Ferenc, I'm +1.
> >
> > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 2:38 PM Ferenc Gerlits <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi community,
> > >
> > > I'd like to initiate a discussion about the next release of MiNiFi C++.
> > > The
> > > last release was three months ago, and there have been many new features,
> > > bug fixes and stability improvements committed to the development branch
> > > since
> > > then.  I would be happy to take on RM duties for this release.
> > >
> > > New features since the 0.9.0 release:
> > > - new processors:
> > >    * ListS3
> > >    * PutAzureBlobStorage
> > >    * ConsumeKafka
> > >    * PerformanceDataMonitor
> > >    * ConsumeJournald
> > > - add resource consumption data to heartbeats
> > > - build with Visual Studio 2019 on Windows.
> > >
> > > A few of the improvements and fixes:
> > > - revive SQL processors
> > > - fix expression language support in PublishKafka
> > > - implement FollowRedirects and SendBody properties in InvokeHTTP
> > > - add Initial Starting Position property to TailFile
> > > - support credential refresh in AWSCredentialsService
> > > - change default C2 protocol to REST
> > > - plus bug fixes, compiler warning fixes etc.
> > >
> > > I suggest we call this release 0.10.0 (rather than 1.0.0).  The code base
> > > is
> > > starting to stabilize and we're getting closer to a 1.0 milestone, but
> > the
> > > extension API is not quite ready yet.  Staying on a 0.x release allows us
> > > more
> > > flexibility until we have an API we can commit to support in the long
> > term.
> > >
> > > Do you agree it is time for a new release?  Are there any blockers that
> > we
> > > should definitely include in this release?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ferenc
> > >
> >

Reply via email to