Hello Does anyone feel that it would be a bad idea/mistake to periodically merge develop into master as we work toward an initial release?
Our intent for 'master' is to reflect the latest release but since we as of yet do not have a release master is not reflecting any of those changes. The very first thing folks try to build or operate on is master. I'm inclined to merge develop to master periodically just to help those folks who may not realize that the 'develop' branch is where the fun is at. Anyway...curious to hear others views. Thanks Joe
