+1 Everything looks good On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote:
> I made some tiny adjustments. > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > You covered all of the ones that I can think of off the top of my head! > > > > > > Joe Witt wrote: > >> > >> All, > >> > >> In light of the fact that the first two people to reach out to me on > this > >> have said they don't know how to validate a release i've updated the > >> release guide with a section titled: > >> > >> "What to validate and how to validate a release" > >> > >> The formatting is truly awful so sorry for that. But hopefully it > >> provides > >> some assistance. > >> > >> Then there is the actual truth...I'm not sure this stuff is accurate. > So > >> appreciate any feedback on that. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Joe > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Joe Witt<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Ok - have switched it to 0.0.1 and updated the release guide. It is > both > >>> our release guide to evaluate and contains our first intended vote > item. > >>> > >>> Please review. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Joe > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Joe Witt<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> i'll send out a note shortly - going ahead and blowing this one away > in > >>>> favor of a 0.0.1 release. Will get that prepped then update the > release > >>>> guide and send another note. > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Joe Witt<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> also of note github appears to have cleared out the tag/release so > >>>>> believe we can go back to 0.0.1 safely. Will wait for feedback on > this > >>>>> thread about what we'd send out and the status of it before redoing > >>>>> that. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Joe Witt<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hello > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I *believe* we're finally ready to do a release. The first thing we > >>>>>> must get released is the nar-maven-plugin. This is because we need > to > >>>>>> depend on this for the full build. This is an artifact which should > >>>>>> hopefully be released very rarely. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Unfortunately I made the mistake of pushing the tag for 0.0.1 to > >>>>>> git/origin which immediately got to github. So whatever...moving on > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> 0.0.2. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I plan to soon send out the e-mail found in the body of the release > >>>>>> guide here: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://nifi.incubator.apache.org/development/release-guide.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please review the release guide and see if it seems reasonable. > >>>>>> Please > >>>>>> feel free to make changes directly. I know the formatting isn't > >>>>>> awesome > >>>>>> but I'm done wrestling with markdown for now. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Specifically please pay attention to the draft PPMC [VOTE] block in > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> release guide. I'll be sending exactly that so perhaps before i > send > >>>>>> out a > >>>>>> bad vote we can iterate on that to practice. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We need PPMC members to attempt to pull the source artifact down, > >>>>>> validate hashes, signatures, build from the sources, ensure all > looks > >>>>>> good. So please give it a shot and let's discuss. Then I'll send > out > >>>>>> a > >>>>>> vote e-mail. To the rest of the community please do feel free to > give > >>>>>> it a > >>>>>> shot and provide feedback as well. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We do need to get through this first one soon so we can get to the > >>>>>> real > >>>>>> deal NiFi release which is when things should start getting really > >>>>>> fun. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Huge thanks to Benson for kicking some release obstacles out of the > >>>>>> way > >>>>>> and shining a light towards where we need to be. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>> Joe > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > > >
