All, We received feedback from an IPMC member who gave us a +1 on the vote for 0.0.2 but provided what he called minor/trivial feedback. The statement he made was:
"Consider adding apache to source artefact names for possible extra legal protection / branding" This concept is discussed briefly in this section [1]. I had personally already seen this guidance and decided not to add it as we were putting artifacts in initially. My reasoning was: - It is not required and of unclear value - It adds an additional seven characters to artifact names which are often already quite long - We already have a maven group name of 'org.apache.nifi' - it didn't appear to me to be common practice among other projects What does cause me to think twice about this though is this IPMC member does a great job of reviewing releases and providing thoughtful and very detailed feedback. So I'd just like us to have a good consensus on this one. If anyone feels strongly that we should add 'apache-' to our artifact names please advise. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#naming Thanks Joe
