+1

Checked on MacOS only:
 - mvn clean package verify (JDK 8 and JDK 11)
 - file signatures

Thanks,
Sergey

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 7:21 PM Nikita Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> All usual checks + all tests under "mvn verify" work for me. Can someone
> verify again whether tests are broken or not? I also checked the v0.6.0 tag
> on Git - works too.
> --
> Nikita Ivanov
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 3:24 AM Sergey Kamov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > -1
> >
> > tests don't work
> >
> >   - under mac - JVM crashed
> >
> >   - under win  - it hangs
> >
> > ticker created (NLPCRAFT-62
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-62> for version 0.6.0
> > <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+NLPCRAFT+AND+fixVersion+%3D+0.6.0
> > >)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sergey
> >
> > 25.05.2020 23:12, Aaron Radzinski пишет:
> > > NLPCraft-ers,
> > > This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.0. This release includes a
> > > number of bug fixes, improvements and brand new real-life example of
> > > accessing SQL database using natural language.
> > >
> > > Quick links:
> > > 1. Release location:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/
> > > 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.0
> > > 3. JIRA issues closed:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
> > > 4. KEYS file:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347774>
> > >
> > > The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here:
> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > > +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
> > > 0 - don't care either way
> > > -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0 (explain why)
> > >
> > > See notes on how to verify release here:
> > > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> > >
> > > The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on May 28, 2020 at
> > midnight
> > > MSK.
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > > --
> > > Aaron Radzinski
> > >
> >

Reply via email to