Hi Julien,

You are correct, as far as I'm aware we're sticking to the Ant/Ivy config.
I think it works excellently for Nutch, especially for testing.

I was under the impression that to publish Nutch artefacts to maven repo we
need to have a working pom.xml? Is this correct? This was all I was
referring to.

I'm not familiar with maven stuff so please correct where my outlook has
gaps.

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Julien Nioche <
lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a bit different from my latest suggestion but also relevant : we
> can generate the POM from the IVY file. I still don't get why we are using
> Maven for building though
>
>
> On 31 October 2011 15:39, Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io>wrote:
>
>> This was the thing, isn't it?
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-995
>>
>> On Monday 31 October 2011 16:28:18 Julien Nioche wrote:
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > I have probably missed a discussion on this lately but I really don't
>> > remember that we'd decided to move from ANT+IVY. We've had numerous
>> > discussions on this in the past, all leading to the conclusion that
>> > maintaining two systems is a bad idea.
>> >
>> > Have I missed something?
>> >
>> > Jul
>> >
>> > PS: If we had to change something, I'd rather go for ANT+MAVEN tasks and
>> > use a single pom.xml for managing the dependencies and declaring our
>> > artefacts when publishing but keep the flexibility of ANT (plus the fact
>> > that we can keep our ANT tasks).
>> >
>> > On 31 October 2011 15:14, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
>> >
>> > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> > > Guys, I'm working on this right now as part of the RC, so hopefully
>> > > should have a working
>> > > Maven build soonish...
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Chris
>> > >
>> > > On Oct 31, 2011, at 8:12 AM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
>> > > > I suppose they probably could Markus. I'm not going to have time to
>> > >
>> > > check them today but will try and experiment locally tomorrow maybe. I
>> > > have a feeling that they're required rather than to0 be excluded. or
>> > > maybe I'm reading the console output incorrectly.
>> > >
>> > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Markus Jelsma <
>> > >
>> > > markus.jel...@openindex.io> wrote:
>> > > > Can't those deps be excluded just like in our ivy.xml?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Monday 31 October 2011 14:05:35 lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
>> > > > > Hi Everyone,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I just ran the maven build on our trunk code, the output of which
>> can
>> > >
>> > > be
>> > >
>> > > > > seen here [1].
>> > > > >
>> > > > > There are some unresolved dependencies which I think fail the
>> build.
>> > > > > I thought this might be useful for anyone dealing with pom.xml
>> files
>> > > > > in
>> > >
>> > > the
>> > >
>> > > > > near future. I'm going to disable the build again for the time
>> being.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Lewis
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [1]
>> > >
>> > >
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Nutch/job/nutch-trunk-maven/3/con
>> > > so
>> > >
>> > > > > le
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
>> > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
>> > > > 050-8536620 / 06-50258350
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Lewis
>> > >
>> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> > > Senior Computer Scientist
>> > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> > > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
>> > > WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> --
>> Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
>> 050-8536620 / 06-50258350
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>



-- 
*Lewis*

Reply via email to