Hi, The keys live at http://www.apache.org/dist/nutch/KEYS ( http://nutch.apache.org/dist/KEYS gives a 404)
Aren't the .asc files supposed to be there as well? ( http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basic-facts). Am getting : *md5sum -c apache-nutch-2.2-src.zip.md5 * md5sum: apache-nutch-2.2-src.zip.md5: no properly formatted MD5 checksum lines found On the plus side the compilation and tests are fine, everything seems to get generated as expected. I don't think we need a new RC just for the signatures but we need to get that fixed in the proper release. +1 then and a huge thanks to Lewis Julien On 1 June 2013 00:17, lewis john mcgibbney <lewi...@apache.org> wrote: > Good Friday Everyone, > > Glad to get to a stage where we can VOTE on the release of the Apache > Nutch 2.2 artifacts. > > We solved a stack of issues: > http://s.apache.org/LPB > > SVN source tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-2.2/ > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-044/ > > Release artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch/nutch2.2/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 4E21557F): > http://nutch.apache.org/dist/KEYS > > Vote will be open for at least least 72 hours, however given this weather > I suppose we can all be forgiven if it is not done over the weekend :0) > > I would like to say a huge thanks all contributors and committers from far > and wide who helped with this release. It is another milestone for us to > get here yet again. > > Have a great weekend > > Lewis > > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!! > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) > > p.s. here's my +1 > > > -- * *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ http://www.digitalpebble.com http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
