[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13938892#comment-13938892
]
ysc edited comment on NUTCH-1739 at 3/18/14 8:04 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------
This patch is produced in the environment of nutch1.7. You can reference this
patch to patch other 1.x version.
was (Author: yangshangchuan):
This patch is produced in the environment of nutch1.7. You can reference this
patch to patch other version.
> ExecutorService field in ParseUtil.java not be right use and cause memory leak
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-1739
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1739
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: parser
> Affects Versions: 1.6, 2.1, 1.7, 2.2, 1.8, 2.2.1
> Environment: JDK32, runtime/local
> Reporter: ysc
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: nutch1.7.patch, nutch2.2.1.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> ########################Problem########################
> java.lang.Exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native
> thread
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.run(LocalJobRunner.java:354)
> Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
> at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method)
> at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:640)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.addThread(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:681)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.addIfUnderMaximumPoolSize(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:727)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.execute(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:655)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.AbstractExecutorService.submit(AbstractExecutorService.java:92)
> at org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseUtil.runParser(ParseUtil.java:159)
> at org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseUtil.parse(ParseUtil.java:93)
> at org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseSegment.map(ParseSegment.java:97)
> at org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseSegment.map(ParseSegment.java:44)
> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:50)
> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:430)
> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:366)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job$MapTaskRunnable.run(LocalJobRunner.java:223)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> ########################Analysis########################
> My server use JDK32. I began thought it was not specify enough memory. I
> passed the test of {{java -Xmx2600m -version}} so I known my server can use
> the max memory is 2.6G. So, I add one line config {{NUTCH_HEAPSIZE=2000}} to
> the script of bin/nutch. But it's not solve the problem.
> Then, I check the source code to see where to produce so many threads. I find
> the code
> {code:java}
> parseResult = new ParseUtil(getConf()).parse(content);
> {code}
> which in line 97 of the java source file
> org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseSegment.java's map method.
> Continue, In the constructor of ParseUtil, instantiate a CachedThreadPool
> object which no limit of the pool size , see the code:
> {code:java}
> executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool(new ThreadFactoryBuilder()
> .setNameFormat("parse-%d").setDaemon(true).build());
> {code}
> Through the above analyse, I know each map method's output will instantiate
> a CachedThreadPool and not to close it. So, ExecutorService field in
> ParseUtil.java not be right use and cause memory leak.
> ########################Solution########################
> Each map method use a shared FixedThreadPool object which's size can be
> config in nutch-site.xml, more detail see the patch file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
