[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14007031#comment-14007031
]
Julien Nioche commented on NUTCH-1785:
--------------------------------------
Not tested it yet but patch looks good. rawContent would be OK, alternatively
'binaryContent' or simply 'binary'? or even 'rawBinary'? or 'byteContent'?
Don't think it makes much of a difference to be honest but since the parameter
name is -addBinaryContent we might chose something that's close to it.
Will you update the SOLR schema to accomodate this new field (even if commented
out)? Is there a field type for binary stuff in SOLR?
> Ability to index raw content
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-1785
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1785
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: indexer
> Reporter: Markus Jelsma
> Assignee: Markus Jelsma
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.9
>
> Attachments: NUTCH-1785-trunk.patch, NUTCH-1785-trunk.patch
>
>
> Some use-cases require Nutch to actually write the raw content a configured
> indexing back-end. Since Content is never read, a plugin is out of the
> question and therefore we need to force IndexJob to process Content as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
