Thanks, Jorge! > I would probably change a couple of details in the deprecation notice. If it > is ok > with you I can send a PR for this later today. But since I see the > deprecation notice > after the release I think we're good to go.
You mean the deprecation notice in the README.md? It can be improved for sure. I think it's not the most important one, as it's only in the 2.x branch and not the master branch. But we need notices on the web site as well. Any help to formulate this nicely is welcome. Thanks! Sebastian On 02.10.19 17:12, Jorge Betancourt wrote: > Hi Seb! > > Everything looks ok from my side: > Compiled successfully from the release-2.4 tag. Tests passed and ran a small > crawl. > > +1 from my side. > > Small detail. I would probably change a couple of details in the deprecation > notice. If it is ok > with you I can send a PR for this later today. But since I see the > deprecation notice after the > release I think we're good to go. > > Best Regards, > Jorge > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:04 AM BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com > <mailto:blackice...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > It makes sense what your saying, better to wrap things up in a tidy way. > I got it last night, I'll give it a spin a bit later > > Greetz > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:41 AM Sebastian Nagel > <wastl.na...@googlemail.com > <mailto:wastl.na...@googlemail.com>> wrote: > > > Is it even relevant at all? > > The release of 2.3.1 dates back to January 2016. That's quite a long > time and we cannot recommend to use 2.3.1 anymore mostly due to > outdated > and potentially vulnerable upstream dependencies Nutch relies on. > So, in consequence we would need to advice all users of 2.3.1 to > switch > to use 1.x/1.15 immediately. > > Also, there are 81 issues resolved in 2.4 - the work on 2.x still > continued > in 2016 and 2017, began to slow down in 2018 and almost entirely > stopped > this year with only a few commits related to maintenance issues. > Would be > somehow sad to leave all the work done addressing these 81 issues > unreleased. > > Of course, if there is nobody which takes the time to test the > release and > vote for it because all thinks it isn't relevant: this would be a > clear vote > not to release and to announce the end of 2.x right now and to > withdraw the > 2.3.1 release packages. The code would be still accessible from the > release > archives and it will als remain in the repositories anyway. > > Best, > Sebastian > > > On 9/24/19 12:11 PM, BlackIce wrote: > > Is it even relevant at all? > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:54 AM Sebastian Nagel > <wastl.na...@googlemail.com > <mailto:wastl.na...@googlemail.com> > > <mailto:wastl.na...@googlemail.com > <mailto:wastl.na...@googlemail.com>>> wrote: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > A first candidate for the Nutch 2.4 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nutch/2.4/ > > > > The release candidate is a zip and tar.gz archive of sources in: > > https://github.com/apache/nutch/tree/release-2.4 > > > > In addition, a staged maven repository is available here: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-1016/ > > > > We addressed 81 issues: > > https://s.apache.org/bFfL > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 2.4. > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority > of at > > least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 2.4. > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > > > Cheers, > > Sebastian > > (On behalf of the Nutch PMC) > > > > > > P.S. Here is my +1 > > Unit tests pass and I've successfully run a small test > crawl > > using HBase 1.14.10 > > > > P.S. Note that the release of 2.4 is considered to be the last > release > > on the 2.x branch. Development on this branch has been > retired > > with no active committers working on it and as Nutch PMC > we feel > > unable to upkeep the support of the 2.x branch. More > details will > > be shared as soon as 2.4 is released. > > >
