[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-3162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18072809#comment-18072809
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NUTCH-3162:
---------------------------------------

lewismc commented on code in PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nutch/pull/906#discussion_r3067764239


##########
src/java/org/apache/nutch/indexer/IndexingJob.java:
##########
@@ -155,6 +159,25 @@ public void index(Path crawlDb, Path linkDb, List<Path> 
segments,
         LOG.error(StringUtils.stringifyException(e));
         throw e;
       }
+      Path latencyDir = new Path(tmp, "_latency");
+      FileSystem fs = tmp.getFileSystem(conf);
+      if (fs.exists(latencyDir)) {
+        try (Job mergeJob = IndexerMapReduce.createLatencyMergeJob(conf, 
latencyDir)) {
+          FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(mergeJob, new Path(tmp, 
"_latency_merge_out"));
+          boolean mergeSuccess = mergeJob.waitForCompletion(true);

Review Comment:
   Yes, I wondered about this. I am not a huge fan of the intermediate output 
being written for IndexerJob either. I think we could even remove the changes 
for this job and address them separately. This will NOT have an impact on the 
Job execution... however the counters are not accurate.





> Latency metrics to properly merge data from all threads and tasks
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-3162
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-3162
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fetcher, indexer, parser
>    Affects Versions: 1.22
>            Reporter: Sebastian Nagel
>            Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.23
>
>
> The latency metrics (NUTCH-3134) have to issues:
> 1. Only the data from one thread is used, in case, a tool is multi-threaded. 
> That's definitely the case for Fetcher. The "emitCounters" methods needs to 
> increment the counter values, instead of calling "setValue". However, this is 
> not the correct approach for the percentiles, see also next point.
> 2. If running full cluster mode with multiple parallel tasks, the task 
> counters are summed up to the job counter value. However, the values of the 
> latency percentiles then turn out to be too high.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to