btashton commented on issue #1: imxrt fixes URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1#issuecomment-568574794 @mubes No complaints on my end (beyond the tedious task of transcribing datasheets to code). This family has been handled so much better by NXP than ST did with the STM32 family. There are a few things I have tweaked across all of the devices, but that is mostly minor and usually just using a better define for example because not all have PADMUX_WAKEUP: ``` - if (index >= IMXRT_PADMUX_WAKEUP_INDEX) + if (index >= IMXRT_PADMUX_SNVS_START_INDEX) ``` Also a couple typeo's like ``` -#define GPIO_LPSPI1_SDI_2 (GPIO_PERIPH | GPIO_ALT4 | GPIO_PADMUX(IMXRT_PADMUX_GPIO_SD_B0_05_INDEX))fb +#define GPIO_LPSPI1_SDI_2 (GPIO_PERIPH | GPIO_ALT4 | GPIO_PADMUX(IMXRT_PADMUX_GPIO_SD_B0_05_INDEX)) ``` There is also a GPIOMUX that they added to help with the lower pincount while still allowing high speed GPIO. Anyway I need to just get this stuff out for comment. Probably need a couple nights to get the core code done, not sure how long the board bit will take. The memory interfaces are a little different. Anyway this is getting off topic for this PR. I'll put a DRAFT PR up before I get the board code done, either a here or on my fork. @davids5 I have not forgotten about your offer, just will likely need to wait until the 1st with travel.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
