This is the final sizes for ESP32-Devkitc and STM32F4Discovery tested
on Ubuntu 20.04:
ESP32:
$ ./tools/configure.sh esp32-devkitc:nsh
$ xtensa-esp32-elf-size nuttx
text data bss dec hex filename
70576 92 4976 75644 1277c nuttx
$ ls -l nuttx.bin
-rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan 123856 May 7 11:36 nuttx.bin
gcc version 8.2.0 (crosstool-NG esp-2020r2)
NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-10.1.0
nsh> free
total used free largest
Umem: 327536 5792 321744 190576
nsh>
STM32F407:
$ ./tools/configure.sh stm32f4discovery:nsh
$ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
text data bss dec hex filename
68516 96 1732 70344 112c8 nuttx
$ ls -l nuttx.bin
-rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan 68612 May 7 11:39 nuttx.bin
gcc version 9.2.1 20191025 (release) [ARM/arm-9-branch revision
277599] (15:9-2019-q4-0ubuntu1)
NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-10.1.0
nsh> free
total used free largest
Umem: 193408 5664 187744 127280
nsh>
On 5/7/21, Alan Carvalho de Assis <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 5/6/21, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> 72h have passed
>> Can we get some votes to finish the 10.1 release?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> Sent: den 3 maj 2021 17:17
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 10.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This is the latest tarball
>>
>> I am sorry for the confusion
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nathan Hartman <[email protected]>
>> Sent: den 3 maj 2021 17:14
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 10.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
>>
>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 1:22 AM Alin Jerpelea <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 RC1 has been staged under [1] and
>>> it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will
>>> seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.
>>>
>>> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1
>>> are required to pass.
>>>
>>> The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3]
>>> "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
>>> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
>>> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
>>> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>>>
>>> A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
>>> our project wiki and can be found here [4].
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
>>> items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
>>>
>>> Thank you all,
>>> Alin Jerpelea
>>>
>>> SCM Information:
>>> Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1
>>> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
>>> 3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b
>>> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
>>> 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/inc
>>> ubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4
>>> HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBF0cM9oFQ$
>>> [2]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apach
>>> e/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u
>>> 7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBELDkRTXA$
>>> [3]
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html*ap
>>> proving-a-release__;Iw!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2
>>> TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBGKE_xsSw$
>>> [4]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis
>>> play/NUTTX/Validating*a*staged*Release__;Kysr!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5
>>> TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBE_QwknXQ$
>>
>>
>> Just to be sure I don't misunderstand, this is the latest release
>> candidate
>> to be tested now?
>>
>> In the future, I recommend to increment the -RC numbers each time there
>> are
>> new tarballs, to avoid any potential confusion.
>>
>> If this is indeed the latest RC, I'll try to test it today.
>>
>> Thanks for all your hard work!!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>>
>
