BTW the version of the OS we have there, is _very_ old.  The description says:

> This is an old snapshot of NuttX from when arch/, configs/, and 
> Documentation/ were submodules

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 5:43 PM Abdelatif Guettouche
<abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I can access it and deleting it is a click away (provided that Github
> doesn't ask for every members approval)
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 5:17 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I just tried accessing github.com/nuttx and it appears that I can no longer
> > see project information.  I don't know what is going on with those
> > repositories.
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:09 AM Abdelatif Guettouche <
> > abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > People who have admin access to that org are all committers/PPMC members.
> > > If we want to take it down we can do that.
> > > As Greg mentioned earlier, that was supposed to host GPL repos and the os
> > > and apps version there are outdated.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 16:53 Tomasz CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have contacted GitHub support in that matter. Maybe taking ownership
> > > > of that org / repo will be possible.
> > > > Tomek
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 4:39 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The project never was at that location, https://github.com/NuttX.
> > > > > Everything there is of uncertain lineage and uncertain and should just
> > > be
> > > > > removed or converted to mirrors.
> > > > >
> > > > > Prior to moving to https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx*, the
> > > > project
> > > > > was on bitbucket at https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/.  The remaining
> > > > > repositories there are the only ones that need to be retained.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 8:27 AM Tomasz CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe you could re-gain access Gregory manage users and put it in an
> > > > > > "archived state" with a note that the project moved to Apache
> > > > > > organization? :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That way nothing will be deleted, while note on new upstream will
> > > > > > redirect users to a new place decreasing confusion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is a chance that someone still may want to use current
> > > > > > repository, or you may want to use it in future in that case
> > > > > > "archiving" will prevent name / ownership takeover.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding kconfig-frontends I am in touch with Espressif and Debian
> > > > > > maintainers, also contacted initial author Yann MORIN. Maybe putting
> > > > > > this package into the Apache organization would be a good idea if
> > > > > > possible..?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks :-)
> > > > > > Tomek
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 4:11 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx is just garbage and should be
> > > > > > deleted.
> > > > > > > It has nothing to do with Apache NuttX and I don't think anything
> > > has
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > touched there in months.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A thought was that this could be a place to keep GPL tools and
> > > > > > applications
> > > > > > > that are needed with NuttX but that are incompatible with the ASF
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > This is where a tool like kconfig-frontends could be supported,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A problem now is that many people have access to the repository 
> > > > > > > and
> > > > it is
> > > > > > > not under the control of any project.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:53 AM Tomasz CEDRO <to...@cedro.info>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello world :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Another thing I found confusing a bit for a newcomer is the dual
> > > > > > > > repository model:
> > > > > > > > 1. https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx
> > > > > > > > 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is not information or redirect on 1 that development takes
> > > > place
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > 2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is 2 going to become 1 back again when incubation is complete?
> > > :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> > > >
> > >

Reply via email to