Hi, From my understanding our project would only replace the current license with
"SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0" which is suggested in the same page Best regards Alin -----Original Message----- From: Abdelatif Guettouche <abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> Sent: den 15 december 2022 12:46 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: DISCUSS: migrate licenses to SPDX We need to consider this: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html*Apply-My-Software__;Iw!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!8eeI5bFJkw51EhNao_c2z-Qw1fXSI9Qk76b-9ssVKGA6HlNYchFxjnbm8lPShd7X7jkHErUAnzBzg7oKDq3gH_aCciXg$ > Note that the Apache Software Foundation uses a different source header that > is related to our use of a CLA. Our instructions for our project's source > headers are here. On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 8:02 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > It looks like the SPDX standard is used by many businesses and it may > have a major deciding factor when an RTOS is picked for a product > > More info regarding SPDX > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://spdx.dev/__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!8ee > I5bFJkw51EhNao_c2z-Qw1fXSI9Qk76b-9ssVKGA6HlNYchFxjnbm8lPShd7X7jkHErUAn > zBzg7oKDq3gHxWdDS9D$ > > Do you think that we should follow the trend and migrate our licenses > to the SPDX format? > > Best regards > Alin
