On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, 16:13 Tomek CEDRO, wrote: > > * Question: Shouldn't 12.2.0-RC0 contain 12.2.0-RC0 version string (it > > is 12.2.0 in the console and 12.2 in the git branch usually RC also > > have their own branch)? > > the rc release after aproval becomes the release without repackinf
Yes, but its not yet 12.2.0 release, so 12.2.0-RC0 is the only valid name here :-) > > * Note: Can we use name branches releases/12.2.0 (currently > > releases/12.2) as "12.2.0" != "12.2" plus remark on RC above :-) > > the release/number is thw main branch from which the tags xx.xx.xx are > generated. on a lomg term having multiple branches for each major and minor > release will be hard to scale and navigate. 12.2 is not the same as 12.2.0 o_O It is hard to navigate right now because I am looking for 12.2.0 and its not there.. the same with 12.2.0-RC0 :-) Please lets keep things coherent :-) > * General Question: Is it possible to reverse ReleaseNotes sorting > > order so the latest release notes are on top (not bottom) of the file? > > :-) > > > > * Note: ReleaseNotes should keep formatting of a release header > > (NuttX-12.2.0\n-----------). > > after this release I am planing to propose moving the release notes to a > separate folder and create a release note file for each release Good idea thanks Alin! :-) Best regards! :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
