+1 tested using ESP32-Devkit:
ESP32:
$ xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/xtensa-esp32-elf/bin/../libexec/gcc/xtensa-esp32-elf/12.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: xtensa-esp32-elf
Configured with:
/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/src/gcc/configure
--build=x86_64-build_pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-build_pc-linux-gnu
--target=xtensa-esp32-elf
--prefix=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf
--exec_prefix=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf
--with-local-prefix=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf/xtensa-esp32-elf
--with-headers=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf/xtensa-esp32-elf/include
--with-newlib --enable-threads=no --disable-shared
--with-pkgversion='crosstool-NG esp-12.2.0_20230208'
--disable-__cxa_atexit --enable-cxx-flags=-ffunction-sections
--disable-libgomp --disable-libmudflap --disable-libmpx
--disable-libssp --disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support
--disable-libstdcxx-verbose
--with-gmp=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools
--with-mpfr=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools
--with-mpc=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools
--with-isl=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools
--enable-lto --enable-target-optspace --without-long-double-128
--disable-nls --enable-multiarch --enable-languages=c,c++
--disable-libstdcxx-verbose --enable-threads=posix
--enable-gcov-custom-rtio --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.2.0 (crosstool-NG esp-12.2.0_20230208)
$ ./tools/configure.sh esp32-devkitc:nsh
$ make flash ESPTOOL_PORT=/dev/ttyUSB0
$ xtensa-esp32-elf-size nuttx
text data bss dec hex filename
84696 420 5272 90388 16114 nuttx
nsh> uname -a
NuttX 12.2.0 26f5e973f6 Jul 3 2023 18:16:21 xtensa esp32-devkitc
nsh> free
total used free largest nused nfree
Umem: 327256 7640 319616 188048 39 3
nsh>
Note: now xtensa gcc version and NuttX version are the same :-D
BR,
Alan
On 6/30/23, Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Apache NuttX 12.2.0 RC0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to vote on
> accepting it for release. Voting will be open for 72hr.
>
>
>
> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are
> required to pass.
>
>
>
> The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3]
> "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed source
> code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on
> their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>
>
>
> A document to walk through some of this process has been published on our
> project wiki and can be found here [4].
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
> items in [4])
>
> [ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
>
>
>
> Thank you all,
>
> Alin Jerpelea
>
>
>
> SCM Information:
>
> Release tag: nuttx-12.2.0-RC0
>
> Hash for the release nuttx tag: 26f5e973f68a7bb4ee66915fce2c723641d5e045
>
> Hash for the release nuttx-apps tag:
> 86efbcbee77bc0a29af07807080f4804a37f46a3
>
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nuttx/12.2.0-RC0/
> [2]
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/nuttx/nuttx-12.2.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes
> [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> [4]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release
>
