+1 tested using ESP32-Devkit: ESP32:
$ xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/xtensa-esp32-elf/bin/../libexec/gcc/xtensa-esp32-elf/12.2.0/lto-wrapper Target: xtensa-esp32-elf Configured with: /builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/src/gcc/configure --build=x86_64-build_pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-build_pc-linux-gnu --target=xtensa-esp32-elf --prefix=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf --exec_prefix=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf --with-local-prefix=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf/xtensa-esp32-elf --with-headers=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf/xtensa-esp32-elf/include --with-newlib --enable-threads=no --disable-shared --with-pkgversion='crosstool-NG esp-12.2.0_20230208' --disable-__cxa_atexit --enable-cxx-flags=-ffunction-sections --disable-libgomp --disable-libmudflap --disable-libmpx --disable-libssp --disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support --disable-libstdcxx-verbose --with-gmp=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools --with-mpfr=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools --with-mpc=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools --with-isl=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools --enable-lto --enable-target-optspace --without-long-double-128 --disable-nls --enable-multiarch --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libstdcxx-verbose --enable-threads=posix --enable-gcov-custom-rtio --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.2.0 (crosstool-NG esp-12.2.0_20230208) $ ./tools/configure.sh esp32-devkitc:nsh $ make flash ESPTOOL_PORT=/dev/ttyUSB0 $ xtensa-esp32-elf-size nuttx text data bss dec hex filename 84696 420 5272 90388 16114 nuttx nsh> uname -a NuttX 12.2.0 26f5e973f6 Jul 3 2023 18:16:21 xtensa esp32-devkitc nsh> free total used free largest nused nfree Umem: 327256 7640 319616 188048 39 3 nsh> Note: now xtensa gcc version and NuttX version are the same :-D BR, Alan On 6/30/23, Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Apache NuttX 12.2.0 RC0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to vote on > accepting it for release. Voting will be open for 72hr. > > > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are > required to pass. > > > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3] > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed source > code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on > their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the > requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on our > project wiki and can be found here [4]. > > > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [4]) > > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > > > Thank you all, > > Alin Jerpelea > > > > SCM Information: > > Release tag: nuttx-12.2.0-RC0 > > Hash for the release nuttx tag: 26f5e973f68a7bb4ee66915fce2c723641d5e045 > > Hash for the release nuttx-apps tag: > 86efbcbee77bc0a29af07807080f4804a37f46a3 > > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nuttx/12.2.0-RC0/ > [2] > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/nuttx/nuttx-12.2.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [4] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release >