Thank you Greg! Indeed, that should be the path in this case, it should be treated as 3rd party code.
Licensing a software as dual license (or triple license as in this case) makes things more complicated. Best Regards, Alan On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 11:54 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/10/2023 7:15 AM, Alan C. Assis wrote: > > I understand your point. And in fact I think the issue is not your > contribution itself, but the future contribution from developers of RTEMS > and Linux that are using GPL. > > I think we have to be careful with the word "contribution". The ASF > cannot accept any contribution that is licensed and copyrighted by some > other entity. To "contribute" the code is to donate the code to the ASF > without retaining any claims to it. Then the code belongs to the ASF and > can be re-licensed as Apache 2.0 with the ASF copyright. > > What you are talking about has to be treated as third party code that > resides with the Apache NuttX code. It is not Apache NuttX code. >
