Sorry for my slow replay

I propose that we create a bare carrier board with connectors for different
SOC modules and different peripherals/storage

This approach would maximize the combinations that can be tested using a
single base board

I would propose that we create the boards stackable with distributed power
and data lines to facilitate the testing farm application

Best regards
Alin


On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:01 PM Alan C. Assis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Tomek,
>
> Thank you for attending the event.
>
> We will mix the two possibilities: we will have basic and most chips (and
> low cost) soldered on the board and we will have connectors available to
> people to test other modules.
>
> This way the board will be useful for testing purposes (to quickly and
> eventually automatically tests) to detect issues and also for pragmatic
> applications.
>
> BR,
>
> Alan
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:49 AM Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Alan for leading this great initiative and everyone
> > paritcipating :-)
> >
> > Sorry I was on the trip yesterday, could only for a moment on a train
> > station, then I lost connectivity :-(
> >
> > This DIMM DDR2 SO-DIMM connector is nice for the CPU board aka
> > "compute module" using similar connectors :-) The only problem I see
> > here is radio antenna connectivity this is always pain in the butt :-P
> > I can see Sebastien commented about 1mm thickness of the PCB but this
> > is not a problem this is standard thickness easy to manufature at home
> > too :-) I use often 0.5mm 1.0m 1.5mm :-) Factories now can make 10
> > layers, flexible, translucent, all sorts of magic :-)
> >
> > Then the mainboard can be easily extended / replaced / upgraded for
> > what is needed. For a long time (since ~1997) I am using this modular
> > approach for various initial prototypes, where each chip has its own
> > board and connectors that can be then connected with other boards
> > breadboards etc. Its very popular nowadays :-)
> >
> > One question - do we want to solder chips on the mainboard or just
> > provide conenctors for the chip-board? Having everything as module
> > would make mainboard cheaper to manufacture, faster to solder, also
> > chip cpecific boards will be faster and cheaper to manufacture, and
> > most of all we would easily reconfigure / upgrade mainboard
> > peripherals when needed even without soldering - we can then replace
> > just one small board when needed. One disadvatage is signal integrity
> > for high speed bus.. but it would be better than loose wires anyways
> > :-)
> >
> > It would be nice if all boards are designed in a way they can be
> > manufactured at home :-) I have pretty good LPKF cnc for pcb so I can
> > test two layer/side designs. But also pcb making with laser printer
> > toner transfer should be possible. Thus some DRC rules would be nice
> > to define such as minimum track width 0.5mm etc :-) Probably for CPU
> > board these will be smaller due to quite dense connector?
> >
> > We could then produce gerber / drill / cut files for the boards, pack
> > them up on a single layout, and send to factory to get a bundle like
> > 5x for low cost and then solder things up at home? Maybe ordering
> > already soldered boards can be cheap too. It would be good to provide
> > cos simulation from various places when things are ready :-)
> >
> > Thanks again! :-)
> > Tomek
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 10:06 PM Alan C. Assis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > Thank all participants of the meeting about the NuttX Standard Board.
> > >
> > > For those who were unable to attend, the video is available on YouTube:
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keZAZ8GiYzI
> > >
> > > Just a summary of our meeting today:
> > >
> > > - It was defined that we should use the DIMM DDR2 SO-DIMM.
> > > Pros: It has 200 positions (pins); Low Cost; Easy to solder manually;
> The
> > > CPU/MCU Modules don't require a connector.
> > > Cons: the CPU/MCU module needs to use ENIG (
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroless_nickel_immersion_gold) that
> > is a
> > > little bit more expensive than simple PCBs
> > >
> > > - In order to simplify the base board routing and avoid complexity some
> > > high speed interfaces (LCD, Ethernet) will be in the CPU/MCU Module.
> (but
> > > the signals will be available in the connector (TBD))
> > > Pros: Simplify the board design; Avoid rigid rule of have only a single
> > > Ethernet's PHY or LCD module tested all the time;
> > > Cons: The CPU/MCU Module will end-up becoming more expensive because
> > these
> > > extra components
> > >
> > > - The Mainboard/Baseboard will have the most common sensors/peripheral
> > > soldereds in the board and an expansion connectors (i.e. MicroBUS,
> P-MOD,
> > > MicroMOD, etc) to let users/developers test other devices.
> > > Pros: Reduce final cost; Brings more flexibility
> > > Cons: Increase the board size to support these expansion connectors.
> > >
> > > We should have a new meeting next week (Sunday) to decide which devices
> > we
> > > will include in the board, if you have suggestions to improve our
> board,
> > > please participate.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 9:14 AM Alan C. Assis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > For those who will participate in the design phase, please join in
> the
> > > > Jitsi, we will start in 45min:
> > > >
> > > > https://meet.jit.si/Developing_NuttX_Standard_Board
> > > >
> > > > BR,
> > > >
> > > > Alan
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 11:57 AM Alan C. Assis <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> We will have tomorrow morning (afternoon/evening for merians A to M)
> > our
> > > >> first meeting about the NuttX Standard Board:
> > > >>
> > > >> https://www.youtube.com/live/keZAZ8GiYzI
> > > >>
> > > >> New to this subject? Ref:
> > > >>
> >
> https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx_hardware/blob/main/Documentation/standard/index.rst
> > > >>
> > > >> Please join us to define which features we need to have in this
> board.
> > > >>
> > > >> BR,
> > > >>
> > > >> Alan
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> >
>

Reply via email to