Check out https://bitbucket.org/patacongo/obsoleted/src/master/ChangeLog. All of the architectures I removed and why are listed there
Hm, judging for the link and from your other message, I think there may have been a misunderstanding. From what you posted ("I have suggested removing support for the 8 bit architectures") , I understood that you previously suggested removing support for architectures that are currently present in the tree and it wasn't done. Now it seems to me like you suggested to remove things mentioned in the link and they were removed. Is that correct?
I also understood that the "Carrying architectures with this level of breakage is misleading" sentence applies to those currently present in NuttX. That was what my other question was leading to - if currently present 8bit CPUs have some known breakage (and if it is under consideration to remove them.)
As an example of what I mean by broken for 8bit CPUs - mentioned in previous message - circbuf_s uses size_t to record head, tail etc. values. With no locking, this is broken for architectures that are not able to read such values atomically.
What I would like to know if there is some other known issue that applies to 8bit CPUs in NuttX.
If no one uses an architecture, it is doomed in the long run. That is inescapable. If you want to keep support you have to use it: "Use it or lose it"
Well, I use AVR and even try to submit patches for it :-) But I also don't (nor want to) have a GitHub account so getting stuff upstream has been somewhat challenging as of late.
