On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:29 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > we at SMILA (http://www.eclipse.org/smila/) think that ODE is great and we > are very keen using it in our project. >
Thanks! > > Unfortunately there is a problem with two libraries that ODE is using: > Jaxen und Saxon. > > Like my colleague August Georg Schmidt (project co-lead) already explained > in his mail-thread "Library usage in ODE" ( > http://ode.markmail.org/search/?q=library%20usage#query:library%20usage+page:1+mid:6fmuuhgsm2d35yv5+state:results), > the legal department of eclipse foundation has rejected these two libraries. > > This means that right now we are not allowed to use ODE in our project L > > > > Therefore I am asking you for your help. > > Could it be possible to replace Jaxen with Xalan and make Saxon optional in > ODE? > As always, everything is possible. Only time is needed to make it happen. Saxon is already optional if you rely only on XPath 1.0. So you would only have to replace Jaxen with Xalan. > > Jürgen told me also, that you are about to release 2.0 beta soon. For us it > would be just perfect if we could have this feature there. > > > > BTW: This idea/suggestion came actually from Matthieu. (See "Library usage > in ODE" mail-thread.) > > > > Of course, if you need any support to accomplish this, we would be more > than happy to help. > Unfortunately, I don't have the time at this point to do this for you. If nobody else volunteers I could give you a few pointers, the code is fairly self contained and there are clear interfaces to implement. What do you think? Cheers, Matthieu > > > > Best regards > > Igor > > > > SMILA project co-lead > > > >
