[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725483#action_12725483
]
Rafal Rusin commented on ODE-626:
---------------------------------
Thanks for reply.
As for:
#1 - suggestion is OK. I just wanted to keep interface separation, because
JobDetailsImpl is not strictly POJO. For example is converts JobType enum to
String type field or pid QName to String pid field. JdbcDelegate makes use of
those public fields. But I agree, it's less mess without separation.
#3 - I kept it for naming reasons. There's a lot of code, which references it.
But I agree it's for removal, so I'll do that.
#4 - OK, I'll do that. I haven't considered migration yet, because Alex pointed
it's not necessary for ODE 2.X, sice it's not in production yet.
> Unpack details blob from ODE_JOB table
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: ODE-626
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-626
> Project: ODE
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: BPEL Runtime
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Rafal Rusin
> Assignee: Rafal Rusin
> Fix For: 2.0
>
> Attachments: unpackJobDetails.patch
>
>
> Related discussion is here:
> http://markmail.org/thread/iiy6utvsqew6nn6m
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
