2010/5/21 Waruna Ranasinghe <waruna...@gmail.com> > 2010/5/21 Rafal Rusin <ra...@intalio.com> > > > Hello, > > > > my suggestion is to use (and possibly extend) external Human Task > > implementation and connect to it using INVOKEs. > > > Yes, I'm using an external Human Task engine. >
Good. > If we use INVOKEs, then how are we going to correlate messages? > By using BPEL correlation sets. > Then we have to add an extra element to the response message from the tasks > to correlate > Is Apache HISE handles correlation as I mentioned above? > HISE returns task id in create task response SOAP header. > > > Thnaks, > Waruna > > > > This way you will have better separation of components. > > You can use Apache HISE for it (http://incubator.apache.org/hise/). > > > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Waruna Ranasinghe <waruna...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi Rafal, > > > > > > I'm trying to implement peopleActivity for BPEL4People as an BPEL > > extension > > > activity > > > You may already aware of this and peopleActivity is a blocking > activity. > > > > > > It is quite convenient to use an extension activity rather than a > > separate > > > process since we need to correlate messages and etc... > > > > > > So do you think that I should drop the extension and go for a separate > > > process? > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Waruna > > > > > > On 21 May 2010 10:19, Rafal Rusin <ra...@intalio.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > is it possible to decompose your extension activity into a process, > > which > > > > will wait for few hours and invoke only > > > > quick parts of code? > > > > > > > > On 12 May 2010 23:51, Waruna Ranasinghe <waruna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi devs, > > > > > > > > > > I have been writing a bpel extension activity which does an > external > > > > service > > > > > call and waits for the response. > > > > > The activity itself is a blocking activity. It may have to wait for > > > hours > > > > to > > > > > get the response, so that it may take hours to complete the > activity. > > > > > > > > > > Problem is, If I create few instances from this process, after > > sometime > > > > it > > > > > will complain about getting database connections saying that "No > > > > > ManagedConnections available within configured blocking timeout ( > > 30000 > > > > [ms] > > > > > ) for pool > > > > > > > org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.SinglePoolConnectionInterceptor" > > > > > > > > > > I think this happens due to the Extension activity which takes > hours > > to > > > > get > > > > > completed, so that the db connection also holds on to it until the > > > > activity > > > > > get completed > > > > > > > > > > Therefore, If we can close the connection after external service > > call, > > > I > > > > > think we can fix this issue. > > > > > > > > > > Any body aware of how to close the db connection within an > extension > > > > > activity or any other work around?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Waruna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Waruna Ranasinghe > > > > > BLOG: http://warunapw.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Rafał Rusin > > > > http://rrusin.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > > Regards, > > > Waruna Ranasinghe > > > BLOG: http://warunapw.blogspot.com > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Rafał Rusin > > http://rrusin.blogspot.com > > > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Regards, > Waruna Ranasinghe > BLOG: http://warunapw.blogspot.com > -- Regards, Rafał Rusin http://rrusin.blogspot.com
