[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rafal Rusin updated ODE-876:
----------------------------

    Attachment: ping-pong-sa-1.0.0.zip
                ping-pong-load-test-soapui-project.xml

I did performance comparison for ODE 1.2 and 1.3.4 JBI for 18 invokes 
(communication between ping and pong is over EIP - Seda Queue).
Test was run on 10 thread. 
Please note that test case needs to be run twice, because JVM optimizes some 
functions and TPS grows. 
 
Results are:
ODE 1.2: 11.33 TPS
ODE 1.3.4: 10.82 TPS

So performance drop is around 5%. 
That's why I need a particular test case. 

Regards

> ODE 1.3.4 is 10 times slower than ODE 1.2
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ODE-876
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-876
>             Project: ODE
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JBI Integration
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.4
>         Environment: ODE 1.3.4 JBI, Fuse 3.4.0.5, ODE database in memory
>            Reporter: Mateusz Nowakowski
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>         Attachments: ping-pong-load-test-soapui-project.xml, 
> ping-pong-sa-1.0.0.zip
>
>
> We've recently migrated from ODE 1.2 JBI to ODE 1.3.4 JBI.
> We were unable to migrate earlier due to criticial bugs in JBI packages in 
> 1.3.3 and 1.3.2..
> We ran the same performance test against new ODE 1.3.4 and previous ODE 1.2
> The same configuration, the same environment, the same test case, only 
> different ODE zip...
> For example:
> A service which has about 7 invokes bpel activities with ODE 1.3.4 spends on 
> processing 5500 ms
> with ODE 1.2 600ms.. The timings spend on these 7 services doesn't change. 
> JBI bus time doesn;t change. Nothing has changed except ODE version.
> It happens the same for our all orchestrated services.
> The only thing which was changed is ODE version.
> I can't provide the test itself (prioprietary) but I can provide 
> configuration.
> Our services are only in memory.
> ODE database is JBI external and it is Derby in memory. 
> However the results are shocking. We of course abandon ODE 1.3.4 ans stay 
> with ODE 1.2, but if it is not fixed, we may abandon ODE completely.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to