On Jan 13, 2007, at 5:45 PM, David E. Jones wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:Mmm... I did not thought about that... To ease reflexion/discussion a quote :"Release branches will be created approximately once per year; these will represent a new minor version number, and in cases ofmajor and/or non-backward compatible changes a major version number"We may use the same acronym than Ubuntu (LTS or our own brand ;o) to characterize major and/or non-backward compatible changes inbranches names ?Isn't that a bit backwards? The point of "LTS" is a promise for the future. A major revision number representing major and/or non- backward compatible changes refers to something that has happened in the past, since the last release branch.
Finishing my thought... we could use some sort of acronym or tag line for major new releases, even if LTS doesn't make as much sense. Of course, if we get to a point where we really like how OFBiz behaves out of the box, then we might want to do a LTS-style release.
-David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
