Re: Copyright Statement

[David E. Jones]

Jacques,





-David


On Jan 16, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

I think it's fine to put these in for now, especially if you've already gone through the bulk of the work. That at least leaves less files to worry about later. As for the ModelInfo and DatabaseUtil files, manual changes are fine. Note that they are probably failing because of some default meta-data that includes copyright strings, and those can probably stay just fine for now.

David & all,


and properties files* only.

only 2 files were not modified to new ASL2 licence. It says

Multiple copyrights found.  File UNCHANGED.
     ModelInfo.java
     DatabaseUtil.java




we test perl batches before ?



Jacques


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dev@ofbiz.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Copyright Statement

I checked the result of work done by Eclipse "Advanced fix copyrights" option in Navigator and it turned just great but for *java It generates a copyrightLog.txt file in workspace root directory (it may work on many projects at a time). In this file I found that I checked this files and actually there a some copyright infos generated in. It seems that ModelInfo.java body has to be updated, licence may be updated by hand. Same for DatabaseUtil.java but simpler. I changed this 2 files by hand. Now I'm asking myself : should I commit this changes (java an properties only) or do you prefer that This tool was used by Eclipse project when they changed licence from 2.1 o 3.1.

Eclipse "Fix copyright" option workss well but only on java and properties files. I will revert and try the batch now.

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

David,

From: "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:41 PM, Chris Howe wrote:

Thanks J Aaron!

David, as per that link, should we make a JIRA issue
to remove the copyright notice from the source
headers?

Interesting... it looks like that page has changed since our pre-
graduation review was done a few months ago.

And yes, according to the new information we need to get this done
before we do the release branch.



Any volunteers to give this a try?

It looks like there are some scripts created for this that can help out.

navigator).

Jacques

I will take a look at this this afternoon (it's 14h00 here). I will also look into Eclipse Licence option (contextual menu in

Thanks,
-David

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature