David E Jones wrote:
The primary goal of a release branch is to stabilize current functionality.
Generally a very important part of that is to not introduce new
functionality that might cause new bugs. That doesn't mean everything
one might want or that might be implied in the data model or other parts
of the system will work as expected, it just means that everything that
IS implemented will function.
Some things are difficult to decide on, but remember the first priority
is stabilization.
-David
In other words, it's okay for the system to function incorrectly, as long as it consistently
functions incorrectly.
;)
If you prefer to keep the Workeffort calendar broken, that's fine with me. When new users ask why
release version 4 has only 29 days in November, I can point them to this discussion and let them
know that November 30th was a new feature that didn't make it into the release.
Adrian Crum wrote:
Moving this to a new thread. I apologize for the threadjack Scott.
I'm puzzled. A Workeffort screen displays a calendar incorrectly and I
submit a patch that fixes it. How is that a new feature?
It sounds to me like bug fixes are okay as long as they don't
introduce new code. What if fixing a bug requires new code?
On 15/06/07, Tim Ruppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Then I guess it depends on whether or not the rest of the fix is
indeed
> fixing a bug or new features :)
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
> --
> Tim Ruppert
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> o:801.649.6594
> f:801.649.6595
>
>
> On Jun 14, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> From my perspective, having two 4ths and only 29 days in November is a
> bug.
>
> David E Jones wrote:
>
> I don't know... that's a fairly big change and in a very real way
> supporting DST changes is a new feature...
> That's my opinion anyway. Doesn't this also depend on a fair amount of
> other new functionality?
> -David
> Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> This isn't already committed, but it needs to go into both -
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1069
>
> -Adrian
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'll be reviewing the last fortnight's trunk commits for merging
back to
> the
> release branch tonight, so if anyone knows of any trunk commits that
> should
> be merged it would be great if you could post them here.
>
> Thanks
> Scott
>
>
>
>
