On Thursday 14 June 2007 04:14:18 pm Adrian Crum wrote: > In other words, it's okay for the system to function incorrectly, as long > as it consistently functions incorrectly. > > ;) > > If you prefer to keep the Workeffort calendar broken, that's fine with me. > When new users ask why release version 4 has only 29 days in November, I > can point them to this discussion and let them know that November 30th was > a new feature that didn't make it into the release.
Ha! Ha ha! Well played. I haven't read this patch but it seems like this bug makes us look rather foolish. I'd vote +1 for that going in even though we are in a freeze, if I was the voting type. Seems like the screen already exists so this isn't "new" even if the implementation is moves around a little. Any new bugs would have to do be pretty significant to compete with a 29 day November. -- Ean Schuessler, CTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com
