let me get my thoughts in order and present a draft.
:)
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/13/2007 8:30 AM:
> Hi BJ,
>
> This is more ambitious than what I was thinking about. But yes why not think
> about a generalisation ? Have you already some ideas ?
>
> Jacques
>
>
> De : "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> There are a lot of services i have added that deal with fraud, orders
>> over a certain amount
>> they are hard coded.
>> however I think this would be a good place to see if we could start a
>> conversation about make the statuses more flexible so customer can add
>> statuses and rules
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/12/2007 4:55 AM:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently wrote a service that runs nighlty to put on hold every
>>> outstanding order (backordered or such) payed with a credit
> card which expiry date is expired or more exactly will be tomorrow. This to
> avoid picking/packing an order which payment can't be
> captured. Actually it's a part of a whole where held orders have also order
> items and OISG held and have also differrent reasons to
> explain why (some automatic, etc.). This last remark because I did not look
> closely to OFBiz OOTB code about held orders but it
> seems that it's not the case (an held order have no order items held, hence I
> guess no OISG). So I wonder if such things would have
> an interest to OFBiz OOTB ?
>>> What do you think ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>
>
>
>
