Thanks David! I'll use that from now on.
David E Jones wrote:
Adrian,
It's great that you're adding comments to the entity definitions to
clarify these things.
There is a feature in the entity def XML files to help with this, namely
the "description" element that goes under almost any of the elements in
that file, including the "field" element.
-David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=569568&r1=569567&r2=569568&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Fri Aug
24 16:16:18 2007
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
title="Content Entity">
<field name="contentId" type="id-ne"></field>
<field name="contentTypeId" type="id"></field>
- <field name="ownerContentId" type="id"></field>
+ <field name="ownerContentId" type="id"></field> <!-- used for
permissions checking -->
<field name="decoratorContentId" type="id"></field>
<field name="instanceOfContentId" type="id"></field>
<field name="dataResourceId" type="id"></field>
@@ -311,8 +311,8 @@
<entity entity-name="ContentAssoc"
package-name="org.ofbiz.content.content"
title="Content Association Entity">
- <field name="contentId" type="id-ne"></field>
- <field name="contentIdTo" type="id-ne"></field>
+ <field name="contentId" type="id-ne"></field> <!-- "parent"
content -->
+ <field name="contentIdTo" type="id-ne"></field> <!-- "child" or
"sub" content -->
<field name="contentAssocTypeId" type="id"></field>
<field name="fromDate" type="date-time"></field>
<field name="thruDate" type="date-time"></field>
